Connect with Pocket Literacy Coach online. Follow our blog for more teaching tips to learn with your child at home!

Why Parent University? Why now? Five decades of research and still fewer than 20% of families have access to high quality preschool

Written by Chris on October 29, 2012 - Leave a Comment

This is Part II of my ongoing series that uncovers the foundations upon which Parent University is built.  For those of you who know me, you know how intensely passionate I am about parent empowerment and early childhood education. My measured demeanor and calm approach to proselytizing about early childhood education and parent empowerment often means that I fail to communicate the acute sense of urgency that percolates through my bones and brain. But make no mistake: this is an urgent issue. When it comes to addressing issues of educational inequality, school readiness, middle school drop out rates, high school graduation rates, college matriculuation, crime rates, teen pregancy, welfare rates, home ownership, financial responsibility, and overall economic impacts of education there is nothing more critical than parent empowerment and early childhood education. But don't ask me about the importance of early intervention. Ask the FIFTY YEARS of research that demonstrates unequivaclly that early developmental intervention has the most meaningful, longest lasting impact on human developmental outcomes of ANYTHING any mammal has developed in the history of history. (The one exception to this might be evolution, but that's pre-history and it's also not exactly something mammals "developed"; so then I suppose there is no excpetion. Forget I brought it up.) That's right, there is over five decades of reserach that proves, over and over and over and over and over again that preschool makes a huge difference. It is not hyperbole to say that "Preschool can save the world." The three most famous longitudinal studies of this phenomenon are: The Chicago Longitudinal Study, The HighScope Perry Preschool Study and the Carolina Abecedarian Project. And of course, I would be remiss to neglect mentioning the most influential early education program ever: Sesame Street, which reaches some 100 million children across the globe). What developmental, educational, economic, and societal impacts have these studies measured? Here's a sampling from the Carolina Abedarian Project:  Major Findings of the Young Adult Follow-Up Study Young adults who received early educational intervention had significantly higher mental test scores from toddlerhood through age 21 than did untreated controls. Averaged over the age span tested, the mental test score effect size for treatment was moderate and considered educationally meaningful. Enhanced language skills in the children appears to have mediated the effects of early intervention on mental test performance (i.e., cognitive skills). Reading achievement scores were consistently higher for individuals with early intervention. Treatment effect sizes remained large from primary school through age 21. Enhanced cognitive skills appeared to mediate treatment effects on reading achievement. Mathematics achievement showed a pattern similar to that for reading, with treated individuals earning higher scores. Effect sizes were medium in contrast to the large effects for reading. Again, enhanced cognitive functioning appeared to mediate treatment effects. Those with treatment were significantly more likely still to be in school at age 21 --40% of the intervention group compared with 20% of the control group. A significant difference was also found for the percent of young adults who ever attended a four-year college. About 35% of the young adults in the intervention group had either graduated from or were at the time of the assessment attending a four-year college or university. In contrast, only about 14% in the control group had done so. Young adults in the intervention group were, on average, two years older (19 years) when their first child was born compared with those in the control group (17 years), although the youngest individuals in both groups were comparable in age when their first child was born. Employment rates were higher (65%) for the treatment group than for the control group (50%), although the trend was not statistically significant. In other words, researchers found that 15 years after students had preschool experiences that their were positive cognitive impact on math and reading, they were more likely to attend and graduate college, less likely to become teen parents, and had higher employment rates. There are many other studies - some of which I have highlighted on this blog before - that illustrate the long-term economic impact. And in another time and place I'll assemble a more comprehensive bibliography of sources I've collected over the years. The body of knowledge about the incredible impact that early intervention has (an "ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure"!) can be overwhelming, actually. And to be honest, I don't believe there is a need for me to catalogue all of the evidence. The impacts are self-evident, common-sensical and, I think, instinctual. So why is there NOT universal preschool? Why is there NOT more early childhood intervention and parent empowerment?  Why, indeed?! The short anser is twofold: access and inefficiency.  Approximately $11 billion in federal and state money are spent on early childhood education and preschool each year serving just under 2 million children. Yet fewer than 1 in 6 eligible families are able to access a Head Start program or other government funded early education program.  By my (conservative) estimates fewer than 20% of US families have access to high quality early childhood care. The US Census Bureau reports that there are over 805,000 childcare centers in the US, but of these 805,000 "centers" the overwhelming majority, 729,741, consist of "self-employed people or other businesses without paid employees." There are 75,000 centers that include the likes of KinderCare, Bright Horizons, Learning Care Group and 7 others who, collectively, serve 671,000 children, or 6.8% of the market. The question, again, is why is there not universal early childhood care? It's not a question asked very often, except by a select group of advocates. In all the noise, hoopla and capital resource dump focused on K-12 and higher ed the most critical time for development is being neglected. Truly this is inexcusable! In a year when a few people on a shoestring budget have reached and taught hundreds of thousands of learners across the globe, democratizing education and empowering higher ed learners like never before (via MOOCs), why have we not even begun to think about applying this to early childhood? ...ahah! But we HAVE begun to think about this. More: we are starting to DO this!  The biggest challenge to universal preschool is not capital resources. Unlike MOOCs for adult learners looking to fill their brains with knowledge about computer science, advanced math, machine learning, and dozens of other courses, impactful early childhood education requires a human touch. Big Bird, Sesame Street and other television or learning apps are good. But in the early childhood years young minds are being impacted more by the models they have to immitate, the safe, warm envrionments for them to play in and social-emotional intreactions with loving adults and peers. That is, early childhood education cannot be outsourced to a screen in the same way that works for adult learners. What, then, is the biggest challenge if it is not capital resources? The biggest challenge is human capital. There already exists an extensive infrastructure that is willing, able and hungry to contribute to our children's development: PARENTS AND FAMILIES! The human capital is already in place, if only they could be coached and trained to be their child's best teacher. Guess what: they can be. Parents are already a child's first and most important teacher; with steady coaching and training, most parents can learn how to be their child's BEST teacher.  And herein lies one of the best solutions to the challenges of universal early childhood education - a system, a platform for training and coaching parents to be an educator to their child. This approach is scalable, doesn't require huge infrastructure investments, and is already proven to have meaningful impacts on family learning.  Parent University is to early childhood education what the MOOC movement is to higher ed. Parent University will democratize and empower family learning and create a new frontier for early childhood education. 

Parent University - small tweaks lead to BIG changes

Written by Chris on October 8, 2012 - Leave a Comment

This is one of the first public introductions to Parent University, the first university to ever grant degrees in parenting. And as such, I want to tell you a bit about the foundation on which Parent University is built. For today I want to talk mostly about the philosophy, mission and praxis of Parent University. In the weeks and months ahead I’ll talk in more detail about our curriculum, pedagogy, vision, faculty, parent-students, technology and more. What is this Parent University based on? One of the most impressive and monumental results of the past 12 or so years my research and practice, along with bodies of research in various fields including my own field of Literacy Studies and others (psychology, anthropology, education, etc.), has been the documentation of this truism: Small acts performed well, repeatedly and overtime, is the basis for excellence. In my research I have come to call this the ethics of training. And if this maxim sounds familiar, it’s because I’m not quite the first to utter it: Aristotle (Ethics) recorded the same profundity millennia ago when he wrote in Ethics that excellence and greatness is constituted not in solitary one time events of glory and achievement but in the everyday practices that lead up to the personification or manifestation of what a milieu considers excellent or great (see also Pierre Bourdieu's Outline of a Theory of Practice, especially the concepts of habitus [and this] and hexis. The truism that excellence does not simply appear like a thunderbolt from the heavens has been demonstrated across cultures throughout human time. Education serves many purposes, one of which is to nurture the potential (potens)of a student and through a course of study bring forth an ability, one that may or may not be innate in the individual. Education empowers (in potens), literally: puts power into a person. But education does not work like a bolt of lightening, and the type of empowerment that education offers takes the type of Aristotilean training that develops positive habits, that allows one to practice small acts repeatedly until theybecomethe sum of those small acts. An approach to education that incorporates an ethics of training may follow any number or combination of educational philosophies (behavorist, progressivist, cognitivist, social). But to truly be transformative for, to truly empower, a student a pedagogy must include a means for the learner to “practice until they become.” The core philosophy and core mission Parent University is to empower families and parents to be their child’s best teacher. To provide the resources, course of performance study, and a pedagogy that helps them be the greatest, most excellent teacher they can be to their child. As such, we’ve developed a curriculum around this core mission and philosophy. And we’ve built a technologically advanced way of delivering the curriculum to help usersperformthe knowledge they are studying and acquiring, to help parentsperform small act well, repeatedly and over time.Parent University is doing something no other institution has ever done before: disrupting education by transforming it through a part of the education infrastructure that has been neglected since the birth of modern schooling system, families. We are coaching parents through our 21stcentury Parent University curriculum and we are granting degrees to parents for the first time ever. But I want to return to the philosophy, mission and the praxis around which Parent University is built. We know that thoughts become word, words become actions, actions become habits, and habits become a part of your character and defines who you are and how engage with the rest of the world. Our approach to education, whether it’s with parents or anybody else, is to focus simultaneously on small thoughts and small actions performed well, but to do so with an acute awareness of the larger context of every day life and with a vision for an excellent future for the lives of our learners, their families and their communities. Education should be andistransformative. Parent University is very explicit about our mission of positively impacting the habits, attitudes and behavior of families. I have buried myself in a range of research from diverse fields in the process of building Parent University. Earlier this week I came across this study on “Power Posing.”  The study itself isn’t directly apropos to the mission of Parent University. However, one of the lead authors, social psychologist Amy Cuddy, gave a TED talk that is directly apropos to the philosophy, mission and praxis of Parent University. You can watch this inspiring TED video here (it is at around the 18 minute mark that Cuddy drives home the part of her thesis that cuts to the heart of what Parent University does). The video is about using your body to change your mind. Cuddy talks about research on how you can consciously take steps to empower yourself by physically changing your posture and your way of being in the world. People can make themselves more powerful by posing in “power stances.” The physiological change occurs as the result of the neuroendocrine effects of increased testosterone and lowered cortisol. Cuddy encourages people to practice empowering yourself. That by doing so you aren’t “faking” a position or posture of power. It’s not a “fake it till you make it” message or argument. Instead, she argues that by physically altering the way you carry yourself in the world a person can experience advantageous and adaptive psychological, physiological and behavioral changes. “Our bodies change our minds, and our minds change our behavior, and our behavior changes our outcomes,” she says. In other words, “Fake it till youbecomeit.” Do it enough until you internalize the power, knowledge, or strength that you want to have. Perform it till you are the “it” you want to be! Cuddy’s is a powerful illustration of what it is Parent University does every day to empower parents. We provide a supportive curriculum that doesn’t just provide parents with a curriculum to follow and learn. We provide a curriculum that is delivered in such a way that parents can easily manage toperform small acts well, repeatedly and over timetill they ARE their child’s BEST teacher. 

The debate over text speak and grammar instruction

Written by Chris on September 13, 2012 - Leave a Comment

In the spirit of reciprocation, I'm reposting my friend Suzannes' rebuttal to our blog debate on "txt speak." You can go directly to her post here.  What do you guys think? This cartoon would be hilarious if it weren’t so ominous. It’s ominous because it pokes fun at a distressing problem: text messaging may be harming kids’ language skills. That's the finding of a newstudy published in New Media & Society, a top-ranked, peer-reviewed journal. The authors of Texting, Techspeak, And Tweens say: The question to date was whether or not adolescents were able to switch between writing text messages and using correct English grammar for class work. The results of this study indicate that most adolescents are not able to do so.  Does this worry you? It worries me. But my friend Chris Drew is unconcerned. In the spirit of friendly debate, we decided to trade blogs on the topic. I’d love to know what you think, too!First, here’s what you should know. Chris is the creator of Pocket Literacy Coach, a very clever resource that provides activities to help parents improve their children’s literacy – and he shares these via text messages to parent subscribers. I, on the other hand, create and share teacher resources for improving children’s writing and grammar – the very skills that appear threatened by “text-speak.” So I guess it’s no surprise that we’re on opposite sides of this discussion. The fundamental question is, Will kids be able to limit their text-speak to a texting context? Or will the frequent use of text-speak bleed into kids’ use of language in more formal settings? If the latter is true, then we’ve got a problem on our hands.  "They spent the summer texting. It takes a while to wean them." The study does not definitively answer the question. But it gives enough cause for concern that we should be paying attention. The authors leave us with this fundamental message: "Adolescents should be educated to understand the differences between techspeak and standard English grammar, recognizing that there is a time and a place for both."How Text-Speak Impacts GrammarSo you can decide for yourself, bear with me for a quick synopsis of the research. Don’t worry – it’s not hard to follow. The researchers compared 6th, 7th, and 8thgraders’ scores on a grammar test to the frequency with which they used common adaptations in text messages:Word Adaptations substitution of homophones (like gr8 for great, or b4 for before) omission of non-essential letters (like wud for would) abbreviations (like btw for by the way) Structural Adaptations   omission of punctuation omission of capitalization The study showed that frequent use of word adaptions in texts correlated to lower grammar scores. But frequent structural adaptations (capitalization and punctuation) did not impact test scores. “Disconfirming Data”This brings me back to the debate with Chris. Chris calls that last finding disconfirmingevidence. In other words, he believes that because kids can still answer test questions even though they misuse punctuation and capitalization frequently in text messages, we needn’t worry about texting degrading language skills. Sorry, but this is a big illogical leap. There are two reasons why.  Three of the five forms of text-speak still correlated with lower test scores The two forms that did not correlate with lower test scores – punctuation and capitalization – are the most basic grammar skills in the English language.Children start learning capitalization and punctuation rules in kindergarten. I guess we can relax knowing that 6th, 7th, and 8th graders still have a grasp ofkindergarten-level grammar rules even though they abuse those rules while texting. But this doesn’t erase the fact that more sophisticated language skills seem to be hard for kids who frequently misuse them in texts.Eloquent, But Off-TopicHere’s another thing. Chris has written a eloquent refutation of the study’s warning. The problem is, much of it is off-topic. Here’s one example. Early on, Chris challenges the notion that kids who use text-speak are lacking in cognitive sophistication. I’m willing to acknowledge that the shortcuts in text-speak demonstrate a certain basic level of “cognitive sophistication.” But that’s not really the point. The study is about the association between texting and kids’ grammar skills. There’s a difference. These aren’t the same at all.Chris is also off-topic in dismissing this research by equating it with the English-only movement, and then diving into the Oakland Ebonics debate of 1996. Whoa! Does this research really merit a recap of the Ebonics vs. English-only controversy? (For the record, I believe that using Ebonics – as some scholars call African-American English – or any form of vernacular is can be appropriate in writing personal narratives. But that’s not the point.) Concern about evidence that texting may degrade children's grammar skills is not ideologically motivated. It springs from a desire to help students succeed in college, in the workplace, and in society.  Linking the Oakland Ebonics debate to this topic is a distraction into a highly-charged issue. Concerns about text-speak seeping into kids’ schoolwork have nothing to do with it. They are about a sincere desire to prepare kids for college and good jobs. Kids who don’t know how to use formal language in real life contexts (tests, job applications, college essays, etc.) will suffer the consequences. Let’s not lose sight of this by throwing Ebonics into the mix!It’s Not PoliticsChris says there’s no empirical evidence that texting is degrading writing skills, because grammar tests are not literacy tests. Personally, I don’t think we’re going to serve our young people by splitting hairs over these fine points. We are talking about a skill set. We are talking about test scores. We’re talking about a pathway to success. Chris believes concerns about texting are motivated by politics. But that’s not what’s driving my concern. If we don’t care whether children have the chance graduate from college or get a high paying job, then let’s excuse their poor grammar. If we don’t care if children are judged by others for their poor use of language, then we needn’t bother about this research. But we teachers are supposed to help our adolescents succeed. Plenty of us are concerned, and we pay attention because we care. Limitations of the StudyStill, there’s one point we agree on. It’s Chris’ statement that correlation does not equal causation. In other words, frequent text-speak is connected to lower grammar test scores, but this doesn’t prove that text-speak caused poor test performance. It may be the other way around: perhaps kids with poorer grammar skills simply use more text-speak. I hope that’s the case. But rather than dismissing these findings, I suggest we pay attention. Until more studies can shine light on this topic, teachers can help by stopping text-speak at the classroom door. I’m not naïve enough to suggest that we all need to throw away our smart phones. Texting is an extremely effective way to communicate in instances when speed is more important than formality. Chris’ company is an outstanding example of an appropriate use of the technology. What do you think, teachers? Is this a problem? Is text-speak creeping into your students’ classwork? ________________ Suzanne's is a very thoughtful and well done piece! She is right to point out that we're likely to disagree, in part because of our respective business interests. However, my perspective is not purely because of my business interests. I taught Composition and Rhetoric at the college level for 10 years and as a professor for 5.5 of those years. Teaching grammar is crucial to helping students and developing writers master the tools necessary for clear and precise communication. On this we 100% agree, I think. The challenge is that many teachers don't have the time/resources to provide adequate feedback for in-depth writing projects and writing instruction. And so many instructors default to what is easy to comment on or instruct: grammar. The result is an over-emphasis on grammar instruction (micro issues) at the cost of instructing on rhetorical skills and deeper structural, arrangement, supporting evidence and other macro writing/communication skills. It's actually no longer much of a debate in the field of Composition and Rhetoric. She is quite correct to point out that without a fuller understading of the context into which Ebonics and English-only fit, that these two issues can be distracting. The point I was raising by citing these two issues was (1) that grammar is but a small part of effective written communication. "Poor grammar" is a sound bite, a bumper sticker trope, that is easily digestible and understandable. When I say Johnny has horrible grammar; Johnny can't write. Everybody gets that. The problem is this: good/bad writing is not defined by grammar. What's harder for people to digest and understand is when we start talking about rhetoric - all the possible means, tools and skills available for constructing a persuasive argument. In rhetoric, punctuation and grammar are but ONE of these tools. And, to boot, grammar falls into the cannon of style.  And (2), my other point was that the debate over txt spk is really an ideological debate that gets in the way of good writing instruction. Grammar should be taught secondarily and within the context of teaching the macro skills of written and oral communication. Focusing on skill and drill grammar instruction as the primary means of teaching writing is detrimental to ars rhetorica. Txt spk is a discourse community convention. Dismissing the way another community communicates is akin to dismissing their identities. And this is why the Ebonics debate is apropos. Not only was the Ebonics issue a political and ideological debate about whose discourse conventions are judged legitimate, but it was also about accepting/rejecting the identities of the speakers from that discourse community.  People may be inclined to surmize that I am advocating for allowing txt spk or other non-standardized dialiects to be taught. Um, no! What I am saying is that any focus on txt spk or other dialects is actually an ideological or political distraction from teaching good writing, because in the course of teaching good writing, in the process of teaching rhetoric, these secondary grammar issues and dialect conflicts get weeded out.  I always love a lively debate and respectful engagement! This is great, Suzanne! Keep up the great work at Write Steps!

Families and Early Childhood Care and Education: Market Snapshot

Written by Chris on September 4, 2012 - Leave a Comment

For those of you interested in the early childhood education and care space, I thought I'd publicize a snapshot of some of the research we've been documenting at Pocket Literacy Coach as we prepare to launch our Global Parent Unviersity.  The first iteration of PLC is a text messaging service. It was built because of a personal pain point we were experiencing as a family. We quickly realized this pain point was ubiquitous to nearly EVERY parent (i.e. too busy, unsure what to do, running out of fresh ideas, etc.). When our sisters first started becoming young mothers we realized the urgent need parents have for easily accessible, high-quality, fun learning activities to do with their child. We are a family of educators, yet even we were finding it a challenge to come up with fun and creative learning activities to do to constantly stimulate the girls. If you're a parent, you KNOW how hard it is to juggle so many responsibilities at once. Having a learning activity already in the queue on your phone gives you confidence as a parent that you're being an awesome mom or dad! This is why we started Pocket Literacy Coach, and this is why we are building the first ever Global Parent University. We know on a personal level and from anecdotes that parents need and want this service. As well, we know on a macro level that there is a desparate need for PLC and Global Parent University. in the US parent involvement levels are surprisingly low - estimates are that between 40%-60% of Kindergartners are not prepared for the demands of school (see my earlier post for details). Parents struggle to encourage learning at home, but it’s not because they don’t want to. It’s because parents do not have support; they do not have a convenient solution. Every year there are 4 million new moms who give birth, and 4 million dads who will be by their sides (overall there are approximately 170 million parents in the US) (US Census, 2011). Many of these 8 million new parents have had no coaching, no training and no previous child-rearing experience. These parents are anxious and curious about what they need to do to be a great parent.  Furthermore, even mediocre-quality childcare and early childhood education is getting farther and farther out of the reach of most American families. According to ChildCare Aware of America’s (formerly NACCRRA) report “Parents and the High Cost of Child Care 2012 Report” only 1 out of 6 eligible low-income children are able to take advantage of Head Start and other government subsidized early childhood programs. And while the economy continues to stagnate, childcare and early education costs continue to rise – at the rate of 10% each year. In 35 US states early childhood care and education costs as much or more than tuition at a 4-year college! The three largest providers of high quality early childhood education and care are also among the most costly. And despite being mulit-billion dollar companies, cost is one of the reasons (among many) why Knowledge Universe, Learning Care Group and Bright Horizons have a combined market share of less than 5%. (See chart below)   While the early childhood education and childcare market remains fragmented, the opportunities are enormous for capitalizing on soaring costs of childcare and the increasing disparity in access to high quality early learning experiences. A mobile, Global Parent University empowers parents to be their child’s best teachers as well as provides a means of supplementing low-quality day cares to transition them into better-resourced child care options for working parents.     (From GSVAdvisors “American Revolution 2.0”, http://gsvadvisors.com/)   FINANCIAL OPPORTUNITY The early childhood education and childcare market is, according to estimates by GSVAdvisors, a $70 billion annual market.   (From GSVAdvisors “American Revolution 2.0”, http://gsvadvisors.com/)   We are focused on education and early childhood spending by families, yielding a $70B+ target market. Family spending on early childhood education, childcare and supplemental education for low-income families in the US is in excess of $9k per year per child (an expenditure that is second only to housing, and for families with more than one child, this cost is often higherthan housing costs). Middle-income and upper-income families spend, on average, between $12K -$25K per child per year (USDA, “Expenditures on Children by Family, 2010”).   Our direct-to-consumer market focus for Global Parent University taps into this $70B+ targeted market (note that total education and childcare spending in the US is over $1.4 trillion per year). Exit valuationsin this space mostly are not disclosed. Maya’s Mom, a social networking site acquired by BabyCenter, was bought in 2007 just one year after raising $1M in angel funding in 2006. Examples of larger acquisitions that have been disclosed include eToys.com 1999 purchase of BabyCenter for $150M. BabyCenter was acquired by Johnson & Johnson from bankrupt eToys.com in 2001 for $10M. Parenting Magazine was one of 17 publications purchased by Bonnier Group for an estimated $210M-$240M in 2007. BabyCenter is the closest comparable to Global Parent University that has available valuation information. ADDITIONAL COMPARABLES In addition to the above statistics about the need for our service on a national level, we know from individual early adopters and large organization early adopters that the parent market is hungry for this service and they are hungry for the type of data our app provides. Text4Baby is an SMS service that supports over 300K pregnant women with prenatal health tips. CafeMom.com is an online community of over 9M moms unique monthly visitors who join forums to find support (in 2007 they raised $5M; though their revenue is undisclosed, it is reported that ad campaigns from fetch fees as high as $500K). BabyCenter reaches 12M US parents and 27M parents worldwide (BabyCenter was bought by eToys.com in 1999 for over $150M; this report indicates that as of 1998 BabyCenter had raised over $13M from investors). Parenting Group reaches over 7.4M moms through their targeted print and online magazines. They were acquired by Bonnier Group in 2007 for ~$230M in cash. BenchPrep is a mobile and web-based test prep service for standardized tests. They are a Platform as a Service product that charges between $100-$249 per user per test prep account. They have 200K users, 7K paying users and raised $6M in Series B round in July ’12. This snapshot of the early childhood care and education market has been designed to offer some perspective on what is currently available to families and to illustrate the gaping and growing shortfall of available resources. We will have more on this soon. 

Trends in ed tech investment: Why the innovators aren’t that innovative.

Written by Chris on August 29, 2012 - Leave a Comment

[Disclaimer: the title is intentionally provocative. Just so there is no confusion as you read through the nuance below, I believe some of the innovations with Coursera, Udacity, Khan Academy, eSpark Learning, and other select ed tech innovators are doing some incredible things to disrupt education for the better. The point is that there is a lopsided focus on disruption and innovation almost exclusively within the taxonomy of one macro trend at the expense of the other.] In case you didn't know, I follow trends in education technology and innovation pretty closely. There's a number of sources I read (edSurge, Education Week, Stanford LDT, GSVAdvisors..>) and leaders/experts I follow on their blogs, Twitter feeds, etc. In this post I want to share some of those micro trends within ed tech and point out the two (at least two) macro trends that frame the micro trends, as well as provide a general overview of larger innovation trends that aren't necessarily technological. By and large nearly all of the micro trends in ed tech fit into one macro trend. Examples of micro trends include MOOC movement, SaaS, LMSs, apps/games, charter school organizations, etc. These micro trends fit into the Traditional School Innovations macro trend. Which is to say, these micro trending innnovations focus on innovating within the traditional education infratructure paradigm. The other major macro trend emphasizes innovations to or within elements of the educational mega system that have been neglected by the traditional approach to schooling for the past 75-100+ years. Which is to say, Parent-Community Infrastructure Innovations focus on leveraging infrastructures that empower learning beyond the walls of the traditional education infrastructure and are helping to reshape a new learning paradigm for learning that empowers teaching-learning beyond schooling infrastructures. Examples of micro innovations within this macro framework include The Hive Learning Network, The Ounce of Prevention Fund's doula program, Pocket Literacy Coach/Parent University, Mom Trusted, Red Tricycle and only a few others.  First a look at the dominating trends: On August 3rd, Stanford University’s School of Education hosted the 2012 Learning, Design and Technology Expo.  As described on the website, “The projects on display at the expo are the hallmark of the LDT Master’s Program at Stanford’s School of Education—representing the culmination of a year of empirical and theoretical engagement with some of the toughest challenges to learning and education.” The LDT Expo has a 15 year history the projects for which focus on “powerful contemporary ideas about learning.” It was a great event with lots of passionate people milling about and considering how to most effectively impact learning within education. The Expo struck me as a great place to plumb the trends of education technology innovation. While there were some interesting ideas, by and large the 20 projects fit into the main category for education innovation that is already most saturated: Games. Of the 20 projects, 10 of them were games or game-based. In other words, scanning the LDT Expo from a distance, as a litmus test for trending edu-tech innovation, what you see is that innovators are committed primarily to a rut: game-based learning. While Stanford stands at the epicenter of the global Silicon Valley and has produced their fair share of thought leaders and innovators in a range of technology sub-spaces, Stanford certainly isn’t the only game in town. There are other places in the edu-tech landscape for measuring trends.  Those places include edSurge, ImagineK12, New School Ventures, 500 Startups, The Gates Foundation, The MacArthur Foundation, Software and Information Industry Association, ASU School Summit and of course investor portfolios and a handful of incubators throughout the country. I would encourage you to probe each of these sources to get a richer feel for the landscape yourself (here's recent article from edSurge and you can download some very detailed industry research from GSVAdvisors here). What I am positing, as one having reviewed these sources and others, as well as having spent nearly 3 years in the space as a tech edupreneur, is that there are five primary categories into which 90-95% of all ed tech innovations fall. Games and learning apps Cloud management platforms (for content, data, classroom management, LMSs, etc.) MOOCs (and MOOC management, e.g. LearningJar) Testing, assessment and communication SaaS and analytics solutions There are outliers to these five major categories, such as cost reduction tools for education such as edShelf (“the Yelp for schools”) or teacher interviewing platforms such as DemoLesson or professional development tools for teachers such as BloomBoard, and, of course, I'm leaving out the school choice and charter school movements (which will remain a major exception to many of the examples herein, mostly because they don't apply to the ed tech theme). But even these examples still reflect the platforms and approaches embodied in the five major categories.  Taking a 50,000 foot view of the trends in these five categories, what we see is a laser like focus on the traditional education system, a system that excludes two major components of the education infrastructure: Parents and Community. In other words, these trending innovations focus exclusively on tweaking approaches that are contained within the Education Industrial complex as it has been defined for the past 75+ years.  There are innovative exceptions that I address below. But these exceptions are barely blips on the education innovation and transformation radar. Before I get to the blips, we should visit the other major influencers who are ascribing to and promoting variations on the 5 major trending categories, namely The Gates Foundation, The MacArthur Foundation, New School Ventures and, to a much smaller degree, 500 Startups.  There is a major difference between the investments being made by Gates, MacArthur and NSV. They are investing in infrastructure and initiatives, not apps, platforms and MOOCs. NSV, for example, heavily invests in charter schools and charter school foundations. MacArthur invests heavily in infrastructure and initiatives such as Hive Learning Network, Quest Schools and the Digital Media Learning Conference. Gates invests heavily in initiatives for measuring, assessing and understanding effective teaching, as well as early learning, higher ed, family homelessness and others. Primarily these three organizations are not focused on investing in for-profit ventures. This is another distinguishing factor about their investments. Where some of the most unique ed tech investing is happening is at 500 Startups (Mom Trusted, PixOwl, Activity Hero, Red Tricycle, Story Panda and Timbuktu Labs represent a miniscule percentage of overall private ed tech investment). And it is through a handful of 500 Startup investments that we will examine the blips I referenced above. First, though, it’s important to understand why they are innovation blips. The short of it is this: education does not happen only within schools. Or, to be more accurate, learning does not happen only within schools. The distinction that is not being fully explored is the difference between education and learning. Education is an industry, a political construct that has many, many constituent parts that have little to do with student learning (see my previous post for more on this). Learning is (or can be) wholly separate from “education.” The reason 90-95% of ed tech innovations are defined as incremental is because they are focused entirely on learning within an education system and an extant paradigm that is highly resistant to change. Learning (and even “education”) also happens at home and in communities. I’ve written before about the larger educational mega-system, which incorporates Home, School, Community as the complete construct for school-aged learning. And those innovation blips that leverage infrastructures outside of the education industrial complex are the ones truly pushing innovation boundaries. (Also, the credibility of this analysis would take a great hit if I neglected to mention the enormous impact of entities who for longer than these newcomers have worked outside the boundary edges of the traditionally defined education system to leverage more elements of the home-school-community infrastructure, such as PBS, the Cooney Institute, BabyCenter, CafeMom, Parenting, Babble, The Ounce of Prevention, and Head Start.) These innovations are leveraging the power of parents to be teachers to children. They are incorporating or engaging communities (primarily parent networks at this point) to crowdsource wisdom and experience. In short, they are creating products that empower learning and education that go beyond the current traditionalist understanding of education-based learning.  Yes, MOOCs and other platforms encourage learning outside of schools. But these are built on the traditional school model and schooling infrastructure to the exclusion of families and communities. An illustration of the differentiation between an approach to learning within a closed school infrastructure and an approach to learning in a more fully integrated education mega system is one wherein business communities influence school curricula and families are empowered to influence learning. 

Education: Wherein lies the real VALUE of an education system?

Written by Chris on August 19, 2012 - Leave a Comment

Spoiler alert! The answer to the question: wherein lies the real value of an education system is pretty simple. LEARNING.  Of course, "learning" can mean a lot of diferent things, and in itslef is not straightforward. For example, there are various learning theories, such as behaviorism, cognitivism and constructivism. You can click here to read a bit more detail about these three examples. For behaviorists they believe that learning happens through conditioning. An example of this would be through rote practice, doing something repeatedly so as to condition certain physical, mental, emotional, etc. behavioral responses. For cognitivists they emphasize that learning is mostly an internal mental process where building "intelligence" is the focus. Constructivist theories have a pedigree that runs from Piaget through Dewey and manifest today most vividly in Montessori teaching methods. Constructivism theorizes that the most effective learning happens in a very personal way by problem solving complex challenges by gradually acquiring the basic, constituent skill-sets needed to solve a challenge, wherein "teacher" plays more of the role of a "guide." There are other learning theories as well, that either branch out from these three major theories or build on top of them. Social theories of learning (a la Vygotsky, Bourdieu or New Literacy Studies), is one such example that emphasize the impact of a learner's milieu, the role of modeling/example setting as well as the impact of community values, norms and expectations. My interepretation of the social theories of learning is that it is an even more holistic approach than even constructivism. Social approaches incorporate mind-body AND milieu as instructional agents. Examples of this approach includes community membership and learning via immersion in said community. Think about the individual and group learning that happens on sports teams, military units, professional schools (law, medicine, business), etc. In other words, learners in these discourse communities learn expected group behaviors, individual skills and acquire mental aptitudes for executing the physical skills while also acquiring the physical ways of being and interacting as a team member/community representative (think ethics in medicine or codes of discipline on a sports team or Marine unit).  {Disclaimer: I stradle the line between social theories of learning and constructivist theories of learning. John Dewey's writings on learning by doing resonate deeply with me. However, the most powerful approaches to inculcating skills, knowledge, norms, values, expectations, etc. is via social theories that include explicit (some might argue behavorist) instructional methods.} Whew! That was kind of heavy. Let's catch our breath for a minute and reconnect to the question about the value of education systems and where we find that value. As I've already said, the value of education lies in the learning that happens in students. Where else is there value in education? Well, education is a pretty big industry (over $1 TRILLION in public money spent per year is a pretty big industry). And that industry supplies a lot of jobs and opportunity. So, even putting student learning itself aside, education as an industry has quite a bit of value.  Where else is there value in the education system? There are lots of other places we can point and find value, such as the economic impact on individual, regional, national and global levels in relation to innovation, civic engagement, etc.  Education systems are valuable at a very basic level as a management system for controlling huge numbers of bodies. Which is to say, education systems play a vital role as baby sitters/child care facilitites. After all, we adults have to work and somebody needs to watch our kids. That's a very cynical view of the value of education systems, but a value nonetheless.  Foundationally, learning is what supports the value of anything else that might also be pinpointed as having value within any education system. Learning is what leads to economic impact. Learning is the premise on which we base our expression for the need for schools, teacher training, publishers, etc. Learning is the justification for baby sitting these large groups of non-adults. Learning, in other words, is THE KEY VALUABLE derivative of any and all education systems.  Education systems include a lot of things that don't related directly (or even indirectly) to learning. For example, think about the direct role that the following things play in student learning: Buses, tests, grades, taxes, school board elections, unions, school buildings, uniforms, administrative and support staff salaries... Keep in mind that I am NOT saying these things are unimportant. Rather, I'm asking us to think about the DIRECT relationship that these things have to student learning. The answer is that they do not have direct relatsionships to student learning. Therefore these things are much less valuable than anything that is DIRECTLY connected to student learning.  To illustrate, let's take buses as an example. What does a student learn from riding a bus? A bus may help a student get to school, but transportation in and of itself is not facilitating any learning. Getting to one's teacher is obviously pretty important, but a student does not need a bus for this. There are many ways that a student can get to a teacher without a bus or even without any transportation at all, for that matter. Therefore a bus is a much LESS valuable part of an education system because it does not directly lead to learning.  Okay, let's turn now to learning. Sometimes we know what learning looks like, sometimes we don't. Some folks think they know what good teaching looks like, and some argue that good teaching is very hard (impossible?) to measure. We'll side step this political hot potato (political hot potatos are part of the education system, too, by the way) and assume that we all agree that teachers by and large make learning happen. I think we can all agree that teachers are pretty important. {Disclaimer: I was a classroom teacher for ~decade.} Regardless of which learning theory above you ascribe to teachers/teaching is essential to student learning.  Where this conversation gets even more interesting, for me and a lot of other people, is in how we define teacher (and teaching). It used to be pretty straightforward. In the 21st century a teacher might be a person or it might be a book. However, a teacher might also be computer, an iPad, a YouTube video, a mobile phone, or a text message. If we define the sole direct arbitor of learning as "teacher" - and thus the most valuable single node in the education system to the student - we should have an accurate definistion of teacher.  I'd like to open up that question to you, the masses, to help construct a 21st century definition of teacher. However we define teacher, and the thing that teacher does in order to make learning happen, it is this thing, this exchange between teacher and student, that is the single most valuable component of the education system.  I'm about to wrap up. But before I do let's think one last deep thought about "So What?" So what's your point? Why is this important?  One of the reasons this education system derivative is so important (aside from the fact that it is the most valuable) is because the "system" and all of these less valuable components of the ed system can be a distraction and detraction to learning. These less valuable components are diluting the value of learning. As we think about reforming, reinventing, transcending (or whatever word you want to insert) education, we must focus on the thing that has the most value and extract it from all the other things.  Learning is the educational derivative that we are focusing on extracting and trading at Pocket Literacy Coach. 

Back to School: Is your child ready for Kindergarten?

Written by Chris on August 17, 2012 - Leave a Comment

[Spoiler alert: scroll to the end if you want to cut to the answer.] A while back I thought I read a statistic that fewer than 40% of US Kindergarteners are prepared for school by the time their parents enroll them for that first year. Or was it only 40% were unprepared? I couldn’t remember, so I went to Uncle Google to pin down the source where I thought I had read this statistic. Turns out that there are no national statistics on Kindergarten readiness. However, there are plenty of regional statistics on school readiness. I’ll leave it to you to hunt and peck for research for your area. Below are a few examples that illuminate the percentages. But the stats don't paint a straight-forward picture. And ultimately it is us as parents who have to assume a role in making sure that our child is ready for Kindergarten. Not only that, but as parents we must feel empowered to continue to play a prominent role in our child's learning and development even when they are in school. Parents cannot rely on outsourcing their child's learning and devopment. Only 51% of Minnesota children are ready for Kindergarten by age 5. In Arizona 64% of Kindergarten teachers reported that children were not prepared. In Indiana 40% of Kindergarten teachers reported that children were “simply unprepared for the demands of the Kindergarten classroom.” In Columbus, Ohio “nearly 40% of the children entering kindergarten required intervention because they lacked foundational skills.” In Sacramento, CA, “First 5 Sacramento, a supporting partner of Sacramento READS! and the largest preschool provider in Sacramento, estimates that at least two-thirds of Sacramento children enter Kindergarten unprepared.” On the local level there’s little reason to doubt the accuracy of these school readiness figures. However, these figures aren’t always straightforward. The reason is because the ways in which “experts” account for school readiness vary. In fact, many education experts are harsh critics of Kindergarten readiness testing because of the inconsistencies of what is assessed and how the results are interpreted. Then there is the disagreement between teachers and parents about what it means to be “school ready.” For example, in this national survey “Parents’ Reports of the School Readiness of Young Children from the National Household Education Surveys Program of 2007 “ by the National Center for Education Statistics, there is a large disparity in what teachers believe are essential school readiness skills versus what parents believe are essential school readiness skills. Interestingly, the teachers focus more on socio-emotional skills (e.g. ability to share, follow directions, get along with peers, etc.), while parents focus more on literacy and math skills (e.g. ability to count to 20, know the ABCs, etc.).  http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008051.pdf As well, the NCES makes no attempt to put a national figure on what percentage of US children are or are not prepared for Kindergarten. Then there are other issues to consider when making the decision about whether as a parent you should start your child in Kindergarten at age 5 or “red shirt” them until they are 6.  Do you want to know what the research shows? Good! So do I. The challenge with the research on holding back or red shirting is that the data is quite mixed. Many 6 year olds who are held back do indeed show that they enter Kindergarten with higher language and math skills. However, those advantages level out as they progress through the grades. For those children who start at age 5, but show several signs of being unprepared, fair no better or worse than 6 year olds who are equally unprepared. They, too, usually level out to be on par with their peers. The real kicker here is twofold: just how far a child is behind (usually referred to as an achievement gap) and poverty. The two are correlated. In some cases children in poverty can start Kindergarten as much as 18 months behind their middle-income and upper-income peers. Sadly, many of these students NEVER catch up to their peers. The achievement gap persists. I could go into more depth about each of these talking point paragraphs and then some (e.g. early childhood care/preschool, reading skills up to and through grade 3, role of parents as teachers at home, and more…). If you’re a parent who is reading this and trying to decide if your child is Kindergarten ready there are a number of factors for you to consider. You absolutely should be teaching your child numbers, letters, colors, etc. You should be reading with your child, telling stories, singing, etc. You should be exploring and playing and encouraging an inquisitive mind. You should be exposing your child to rich vocabulary (talk using big words), including them in adult conversations (let them hear you talk about your day at work or a financial challenge you’re working to solve) and encouraging critical thinking. However, you should also be working on emotional skills, communication skills, listening skills, peer-interaction skills, discipline, cleanliness, self-control and the like. Most importantly, as parents you need to remember that you cannot outsource all of your child’s learning and development. YOU are your child’s first teacher. YOU are your child’s most important teacher. Learning is not the sole responsibility of the school system or your child’s teacher. As a parent there should be a collaborative effort between parent-child-teacher throughout your child’s ENTIRE schooling experience to ensure that learning and development are happening. Parents, you should be empowered to play an active role. Then, as your child grown into an adolescent and a young adult, they, too, should be empowered to play a major role in their learning and development.

Text messaging does not negatively impact literacy skills

Written by Chris on August 14, 2012 - Leave a Comment

A friend of mine, Suzanne, at Write Steps recenlty shared a story about how "Texting May Undermine Language, Spelling Skills." It's an interesting summary of a new study about correlations between "techspeak" and grammar test performance. We had a friendly back and forth about our disparate perspectives on this issue. In a nutshell, she generally supports the claims of the article, and I do not. The issue of texting impacting language and grammar skills is much more complex than this one story would lead us to believe. As pop news reporting on academic reserach usually goes, though, the author, Rick Nauert, doesn't quite flesh out the whole story from a much larger context. So Suzanne and I had a bit of a back and forth and we decided to trade our thoughts more publicly to see what our reasders think and where they stand.   For those who don't know, my Ph.D. is literacy and language studies, and some of my focus was in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology, so I've studied the issue of discourse conventions and even have personally delved into some reserach on texting and language use. ONe thing is pretty clear from my perspective: The claim that teachers, educators and technology neigh-sayers throw around that "Texting is the degradation of literacy" or that using "textspeak" means that kids are lacking in cognitive sophistication are unfounded. In fact, the theories of sociolinguistics - especially the school of thought from New Literacy Studies scholars such as James Gee, Brian Street, David Barton and the like - anticipated such claims and rebuked them long ago. Long before there was even text messaging in fact! Now there is a new peer-reviewed book scheduled for release from Routlege called Text Messaging and Literacy - The Evidence that includes several academic studies, a few of which are longitudinal, that demonstrate that text messaging not only is NOT harmful to literacy and spelling skills, but that the ability to use text speak is actually evidence for sophisticated phonological skills and thinking skills. To be clear, I have not yet read the book (because it's not available till April 2013), but I have read one of the co-author's, Clare Wood, work on texting and literacy. Based on the review found here, and my knowledge of Wood's previous research on the topic, I feel this is a pretty fair, though superficial, summary of the primary thesis.  The Penn State study summarized by Nauert appears to be the results of a single survey wherein a group of 9th graders took a single grammar test. Then the researchers attempted to correlate the grammar errors to "textspeek" based on the previous 3 inbound and outbound messages in the students' phones. First, correlation is not causation. Second, there is a whopper of a piece of disconfirming data in their own study: though students didn't always capitalize or punctuate properly in txt spk, they nailed both on the grammar quizzes. The summary of the research doesn't reveal much about the methodology, though. The impression, though, is that the study consisted of surveying a group of 9th graders and then correlating the survey results with a single, isolated grammar test.  This topic of whether or to what degree texting impacts langauge is controversial and always gets a lot of attention from teachers and parents.  An interesting paradox of all this attention and the claims of a language and literacy crisis is that since the cries of "Johnny Can't Read" from the mid-1980s literacy rates in the US have continually and steadily risen. Yet the cries continue. Why? Mostly because the Johnny Can't Read movement was based in part in the plain English movement of the time, which is akin to the English Only movement that existed before and has persisted since. Issues of langauge and literacy are never completely straight forward. Which is to say, most of the debate around language and literacy is a political one (much like the Oakland Ebonics debate of the mid-90's was actually about access to state-allocated dollars for second-langauge learners, but got turned into a racial issue. Perhaps as it rightfully should have been, because there's plenty of research on discrimination based on speech (nearly all of William Labov's oeuvre is dedicated to this; and another famous sociolinguist, Geneva Smitherman, has likewise written and testified in court cases about racialized perceptions of dialects and how it manifests as discrimination in education systems, housing, and job hunting). So how can I say this a political debate? Because at the crux of the (dubious?) arguments about a language and literacy crisis is a more material motivation: resources in the form of cash. Crises drive resources. Crises inspire voters and votes. Votes move government dollars. Special interest groups publicize crises to drum up popular support. "You want illiterate kids? No? Then give us more money so Johnny can read!" Again, the paradox: teachers have actually gotten better and more effective over the past 3 decades, and as a result Johnny and Janie are reading more; they're reading better. And there are more Johnny and Janie's reading in toto.  We don't cry foul when bankers talk of APRs or when finance folks talk about ROI or when military folks and media speak of IEDs or MREs. There are plenty of acronyms used all around us, yet somehow LOL, WTF, RALMAO, BRB freaks people out.  Two things are happening when critics call foul of txt spk. One, there is an underlying call for more resources. So there is political or cash motivation somewhere to be found. Two, there is a fundamental misunderstanding of the conventions of a discourse community that is different from one's own. An English-Only, language purist is likely not someone who is an avid communicator with a teenage smartphone user who is txtng upwards of 3,000 times per month.  A critic with a position in this debate opposite of my own may argue, "These acronyms, misspellings and poor punctuation is just the tip of a larger iceberg. It's indicative of sloppiness with langauge or the degredation/loss of literacy skills." First, there is no empirical evidence for supporting this claim. None. Not even the Penn State study qualifies as evidence of txt spk as the degredation of literacy, because, mostly, grammar tests are not literacy tests. Mostly this debate is an ideological one. 

Sponge Kids Square Pants - They're getting it from somewhere

Written by Chris on August 14, 2012 - Leave a Comment

Our kids are such sponges! Just the other day while Chris and Paityn were playing house (Paityn was the mom and Chris was being the toddler), Chris said he was going to go play with one of his friends and pick up the toys later. Paityn, the four year old “mom,” quickly interjected, “Oh, uh uh. I am *not* trying to hear that!” It was hilarious and cute as heck. But Kelley, Dustin and I were all confused. We don’t use the expression “I’m not trying to hear that” – certainly not around the children. But Paityn had picked it up from somewhere. And since Paityin’s circle of friends doesn’t extend much farther than family and day care, there’s a good chance that she did pick it up from one of us adults. While Paityn’s sass was both cute and hilarious – and correctly used – it gave us pause to think about the little things that we do with Paityn, Rylee, Tess and Cor. They are absorbing every little thing we do. Even when we’re not trying to teach them manners, habits or other behaviors such as good learning practices or nutrition, they are picking up on what we do. And they’re imitating it! Teaching by modeling is one of the most powerful ways of instilling behaviors, habits and values. One of the things we’ve done as a family is talk about the types of behaviors and values we want to instill so that we as adults can be more conscientious of how we act, talk and behave around the kids. What are some of the behaviors and values that you want to instill in your children? What are some fun ways you're doing it? We want to know!

The story of Pocket Literacy Coach and the question: Where do you find inspiration?

Written by Chris on August 14, 2012 - Leave a Comment

In the previous post I wrote about the deep impact that my relationship with Sam had on the mission of Pocket Literacy Coach and to the story of Pocket Literacy Coach. Part of the genesis of Pocket Literacy Coach was establishing a mission that recognized how important it is for moms and dads to feel and be supported in what they do as parents day in and day out. I left off in the last post talking about how it is our mission to play this role of supporting and recognizing the daily greatness of moms and dads. Related to this, I wrote about how important it is to be a part of a supportive and inspirational community. Today’s post is a continuation of the winding narrative that is the story of Pocket Literacy Coach. As I’ve mentioned before, there is a nice, neat linear version of the history of Pocket Literacy Coach that I often tell. But that version of our history elides some very important additional influences. Such as the ongoing influence of another great woman in my life, Michelle Ernsdorff. Last week I received an early morning phone call from my friend Michelle. It was kind of a random call; she called to share some of her always positive outlook. It started off as a short call just to say some kind words, some uplifting words, words of support. This is the type of person Michelle is and is an example of the type of call you will often get from her. In other words, she’s awesome! On this particular morning she called to say thank you to me for being a shoulder to lean on, share war stories with, talk about the ups and downs and growing pains of the babies we’re each trying to raise, etc. Michelle and I met a few years ago, right around the time she had launched her foundation and around the time I launched Pocket Literacy Coach. We connected almost instantly and have been great friends ever since. One of the things that is always awkward for me when I get a call like this from Michelle is that she says what a great influence I have been and that my support means so much to her. The thing that is uncomfortable about this heaping of gratitude and appreciation is that it always feels unwarranted. You see, Michelle is a very accomplished businesswoman and entrepreneur. She is the founder and CEO of an amazing childhood cancer foundation that is helping families with children with cancer crisscross the country to get cancer treatment. She is literally helping to save lives. Michelle is a childhood cancer survivor herself, and has one of the most harrowing, heart-wrenching stories of cancer triumph you’ll ever hear. Just being around her to hear her talk will inspire the crap out of you! Yet she thinks that I inspire HER!  This is amazingly accomplished woman calls to tell ME, a guy who sends text messages to parents’ phones, that I motivate and inspire HER. Yeah right! The thing about Michelle is, she means it. And herein lies the moral of this short story: we ALL need support; we all need encouragement; we all need to be inspired and motivated. Sometimes that support, encouragement and inspiration come in unexpected packages. Sometimes we see inspiration in places other people don’t. Sometimes we feel supported by things other people don’t even realize they are doing. Almost all of the time, it is a simple act of listening, being a shoulder to lean on, saying an uplifting word, smiling and saying, “Way to go, Chris. You sent out a really great text message today to those parents!” Small recognitions go a long way. In the same way that I take it for granted that I support and encourage Michelle, she probably does not see or recognize all the ways that she supports and inspires me. It’s the small, consistent acts of support that have the greatest impact on others. And that’s the point of this post – and it’s a key part of our mission at Pocket Literacy Coach: small, consistent acts of support go a long way! Having a community of people to lean on is essential. Michelle, and her phone call today, embodies the key elements of our mission at Pocket Literacy Coach, which is to support, encourage, recognize, inspire and empower moms and dads in small ways and big. Michelle is not the only amazing woman who is a part of the Pocket Literacy Coach story. In another post I’ll tell you about another inspiring woman and mother who is part of the Pocket Literacy Coach story. Stay tuned...

The self-doubt of an amazing mom - why Pocket Literacy Coach supports parents!

Written by Chris on August 6, 2012 - Leave a Comment

There’s a question people ask me that comes up quite frequently about the genesis of Pocket Literacy Coach. Pocket Literacy Coach is an interesting company and people want to know the story: Why did you start Pocket Literacy Coach? What compelled you to start sending parents these text messages? I usually respond with a relatively standardized answer, one I’ve given dozens of times before (in fact, you can listen to that rehearsed answer here, if you’d like). However, the fuller version has more nuance to it. Several years ago I was in a great, but complicated, relationship with a single mother. We’ll call her Melody (not her real name). Melody was smart, ambitious, athletic, relatively accomplished in her nascent career, deeply passionate, but also insecure, stressed, over-worked, constantly worried about choices she was making for Sam (her 8 year old, again, not her real name). She was also always looking for someone to lean on and support her – even if it was just with an encouraging word, a word of recognition and validation: Melody, you ARE a great mother! You’re doing an amazing job. I see all the sacrifices you’re making for Sam, and it’s going to lead to great things for Sam.  Melody was a great mother. But she always felt like she was not a good enough mom. She was constantly comparing herself to other mothers, other families, worried about what the teachers thought about her being a single mom, worried that Sam’s dad didn’t see Sam enough, etc. In other words, even though she was an amazing mom, she always had self-doubt and lack of confidence and feelings of guilt about not doing enough. My relationship with Melody was the first time I was able to see first hand, and in great and intimate detail, the enormous burdens that mothers carry. Melody showed me the heavy heart of a mother and the love and care that goes into being an awesome mom on a daily basis. I always appreciated my own mother, but a lot of moms do a great job of keeping the worries and burdens that I saw with Melody hidden from family, friends and especially the kids. My relationship with Melody made me appreciate my mom so much more. So what do Melody and Sam have to do with Pocket Literacy Coach? To be honest, Melody was not the inspiration for Pocket Literacy Coach. At least not the inspiration for the educational component. The impetus for Pocket Literacy Coach was to start an educational movement that empowers parents to be their child’s first and BEST teacher starting from birth. But being a part of Melody and Sam’s lives showed me something that I had never seen before about motherhood or fatherhood: moms need support. Moms and dads need to hear how special they are, what a great job their doing, reassured that their decisions are the best ones for their child, that they are beautiful and strong and appreciated. Moms and dads don’t just NEED to hear these things; they deserve to hear these things. In other words, sometimes parents just need an emotional pat on the back, recognition. Sometimes parents need a lot more support than just a pat or an acknowledgement. But that pat and acknowledgement can go a really long way. My focus at Pocket Literacy Coach is to support parents. Currently the focus of that support centers around education. What’s exciting about our forthcoming mobile Parent University platform, though, is that this support will broaden. This is something I’m really excited about because it’s going to allow parents to have deeper, more engaged two way conversations with us and with other parents. It’s going to allow us to become a more supportive platform and community. It’s going to be amazing! Athletes, soldiers, and salespeople aren’t the only ones who need to hear motivational speeches or have inspirational stories. We all need that emotional and psychological shot of adrenaline sometimes. We all need to see and be connected with others who are doing extraordinary things. Moms and dads achieve extraordinary things EVERY DAY. Our mission is not only to support those superhero-like achievements, but to help parents share them with the world and be recognized for being awesome parents.  Melody is an inspiring mom. The little things she did each day to make sure Sam had every opportunity to develop into a happy, healthy, successful child had a profound impact on me and on Pocket Literacy Coach. In the next post I’ll tell you about another amazing woman. Like Melody, she’s not the impetus for Pocket Literacy Coach. However, she is one of these emotionally and psychologically supportive characters in the story of Pocket Literacy Coach’s success. She is an example of someone who is doing inspirational things and sharing those things with me and be a support to me and working to lift up me (and Pocket Literacy Coach). These are the types of people we all need in our lives. And it’s my mission, our mission, at Pocket Literacy Coach to not just be this type of influence in YOUR life, but to hopefully connect you with other moms and dads so they can support you, and, when they need it, you can support them. This is our mission, one that I hope you can help us spread to other parents, to help us continue to grow this network of positivity, uplift and support. Stay tuned for the next post to hear more about the story of Pocket Literacy Coach.

Visualizing success for yourself and your child

Written by Chris on July 31, 2012 - Leave a Comment

Recently we've started pinning various fun, inspirational or just cool stuff on Pinterest (and we're starting to see what all the excitiement is about - so much fun!). One element of Pinterest that is so compelling is how visual it is. Being able to see - and not just read - is a powerful approach to communication and learning (a picture is worth a thousand words, right!). I don't need to make an argument to convince you of the power of pictures and visuals (so I won't :-). Instead, I just wanted to take a quick few seconds to illustrate the power of visualizing. And, in particular, visualizing positive outcomes for your and your child.  Positive outcomes can look like anything you want. And success - or greatness, as this Nike picture illustrates - manifests in lots of ways. The message in this image is simply wonderful: greatness comes in doing; greatness is in trying; greatness is in challenging yourself.  Having visuals such as this to look at and find inspiration is great. What visuals do you create of yourself? How do you define  a positive outcome, success or even greatness for yourself and your family? It's different for everybody. But the secret to achieving it - to achieving anything - is in the doing, the trying...taking that first step in a challenge (the first step is sometimes the hardest).  A great activity for you to do as a parent is to take a picture of yourself doing something hard, something that challenges you. Take a picture of yourself taking that first step towards whatever goal you want to achieve. And post that picture with a small caption describing the first step and describing the goal. This is a great activity to do with your child, too. Ask them, What's something you'd really like to do that you haven't done yet? Take a picture of the goal and take a picture of your child taking their first step towards that goal. Put them up side-by-side where everybody can see it - the bathroom mirror, the fridge, the bedroom door.  Maybe you can even Pin it on Pinterest or post it on Facebook. I'd love to see what you come up with.  Visualizing is so powerful, and it's one of the reasons I've started pinning things. Come follow us on Pinterest and tell us what you think. And don't forget to share with us, too!

Texting as early intervention and support

Written by Chris on June 20, 2012 - Leave a Comment

Around our house we watch a lot of TED talks. TED is a speakers series where various experts in various fields hop on stage and deliver enlightening and entertaining speaches about BIG ideas. And they're all free to watch. Two recent TED talks that we have watched are Nancy Lublin's "Texting that saves lives" and David R. Row's "Lessons from death row inmates." The subject matter is a bit heavy compared to the likes of more lighthearted and entertaining TED talks such as Joe Smith's "How to use a paper towel" or Reggie Watts' "disorient[ing] you in the most entertaining way". All of these are worth a look-see, and you should check out these and many others, but I want to share some quick thoughts on Lublin's and Row's insights. Nancy Lublin makes the argument that "texting saves lives," and she provides a number of examples of how her organization has used text messaging as a line of communication, as a support mechanism, for some youngsters who need help. Originally her organization - DoSomething.org - implemented the text messaging program as a way to more effectively reach their audience with their social advocacy content. What they found, though, was that kids started to text them back. And a lot of times the messages they were receiving were pleas for help. Lublin and her organization found that some of the members they were texting were isolated, alone and had no one else to turn to. The text messaging program turned out to be one of these youngsters few outlets - the only outlet apparently - they could use to feel supported, who they could cry out to in their time of need. Some of the stories she shares are sad, really sad. Like the young girl who was being sexually abused and texted Lublin's group for help. The stories illustrate a powerful point: the enormous impact of a seemingly simple use of technology, text messaging. This often overlooked approach to communication, for many reasons, serves as a life-line for many people. The need for a lifeline and some sort of process of intervention is exactly what David Row talks about in his TED talk. Row, who is a death row lawyer with 20 years of experience, focuses his story telling on the life of one of his clients, Will. Will was executed a number of years ago after being convicted of a horrible murder. Row is not an apologist for Will necessarily. Bad people who do bad things must be punished. Row's story focuses on Will's story because he believes the murder that Will committed could have been prevented if only there had been some form, ANY form, of early intervention in Will's tragic early childhood. Starting at the age of 5 Will was exposed to murder, suicide, loneliness and abandonmnet. Eventually he ended up in a gang, then in the juvenille justice system and eventually to the point where he committed grizzly crimes. Row's primary point in his talk is that Will's life trajectory could have been altered, the murder Will committed could have been prevented if only there had been some form, some process, of reaching Will or his mom and family sooner. As Row points out, $15,000 worth of early intervention in the life of a troubled youth can prevent $80,000 worth of court, lawyer and incarceration costs later in that person's life (76% of people who commit murders were at some point earlier in their life in the juvenille justice system). It's a bit of a leap to think that texting might have helped save Will's life and the life of his victim. But I want us to imagine taking that leap. One of the connectors between the stories in Row's and Lublin's videso is that the folks Row and Lublin are serving were isolated and alone and exposed to violence. What if all it took was a simple text message of encouragement or a message with information of where to go to find shelter and protection or a text message that simply says you matter and there is a safe place for you? Small things in life matter. And it is small interventions, small ways of supporting people, that can have the biggest and most meaningful impacts over the long term. 

Behind the scenes look at Nidaba development.

Written by Chris on June 11, 2012 - Leave a Comment

For the past few months we have been too quite about what we have been up to. Very soon we will be announcing the release of second major parenting platform, Nidaba. Nidaba is named after the Sumerian goddess of learning and education. And like Nidaba who protected ancient scrolls and empowered the scribes, our app promises to deliver to parents the valuable knowledge and education information that you want and need to be the first and most important teachers that your child will ever have! Our mission has always been to support and empower you, parents. And our new app will do this in a much more robust and exciting way. Oh, and it will be free to use! We have been receiving a lot of inquiries from organizations and other interested parties about what it is we've been up to. To provide a few more details, we are publishing a brief executive summary of the features and benefits of Nidaba, along with some insights into who we are serving and how we are innovating in impressive ways. Stay tuned for more... Nidaba Executive Summary Nidaba is a mobile education app that facilitates the social gamification of parenting. Nidaba users receive daily push notifications with vetted, high-quality educational content. The notifications include activities for parents to do with their 0-12 year old children. Parents track and share their child's developmental progress with the Nidaba Progress Meter while also earning Nidaba currency for doing activities and for social sharing. Nidaba is the evolution of Pocket Literacy Coach and leverages PLC content and partnerships.   Every year in the US there are 4,000,000 mothers who give birth. The Nidaba market includes these 8,000,000 new moms and dads along with the 85 million existing parents in the US, the majority of who are smart phone-using parents. Research proves that parents not only need support but want support with high-quality content to help them be the best parents they can be. While there are comparables in the space of parent education content providing, Nidaba is the first and most innovative mover in the arena of social parenting. Text4Baby is a successful example of using mass SMS to provide prenatal health tips to over 300,000 moms. GreatSchools, Inc. is experimenting with robo-calling to provide content to parents. Parenting magazine and CafeMom.com rely exclusively on their websites and email newsletters to provide parent content to approximately 35 million users.  Nidaba is the first and only mobile app to support parents right where they are: on their phones! Nidaba provides convenient support and easily accessible empowerment via our push notification system, Nidaba Progress Meter, social sharing features and Nidaba virtual currency exchange.   Through our established partnerships with the leading education organizations in the US, along with our existing B2C user base, and as a result of our marketing campaign and viral spread of Nidaba, we expect to have a user base of between 3-10 million by the end of our first full year of operation in the Android market and iTunes stores. Nidaba is free to the end user. Revenue streams come from ad support, branded content from sponsors, Nidaba currency exchange with sponsors, a premium version as well as back-end data licensing.   The Nidaba team includes experienced entrepreneurs, kickass programmers and seasoned educators. The Nidaba team has worked together to build an innovative education technology company that disrupts the way families, education organizations, and edu-tech innovators are thinking about education reform.  

Why early childhood education is important!

Written by Chris on December 16, 2011 - Leave a Comment

If you've been following this blog over the past few months, then you already know some of the key stats about early literacy: fewer than 45% of US parents read to their 0-4 year olds. Fewer than 28% of US parents tell stories to their 0-4 year olds. And if you follow Pocket Literacy Coach then you know why these early reading, story-telling and parent-child communication activities are so important: the number of words a child is exposed to during their infancy directly impacts IQ. The wider the range of vocabulary a child hears, the more communication and interaction a child has during infancy, the bigger positive impact it has on brain development.  So why is early childhood education so important? Because many parents work multiple jobs, most parents do not have an education degree, and many parents simply do not have the resources or know-how to help stimulate their child's brain development in the ways we know work best. Did you know that "children from low-income families who start kindergarten without any schooling are estimated to start school 18 months behind their peers, a gap that is extremely difficult to overcome." (The National Institute for Early Education Research also has some great information. So too does The Ounce of Prevention.) You may have read today that the US Department of Education will release the winners of the Race To The Top grant for early childhood education to nine states. Helping improve access to early childhood education resources is a great thing. What are some resources that you know of or that you use to help stimulate your child? Below are some activities for you to use with your 2, 3 and 4 year olds. And of course, if ever you want more, you know where to find us :-) 2 year olds:  Find text everywhere! Help ur child realize letters & words r everywhere in our world. Point out words at the grocery or while on a walk. Point out specific letters 2. While reading a story together ask ur child to point ot the pic on the page and then the words on the page. Help them run their finger from left to right over the words. Show ur child a magazine. Ask them to show u a page. Next ask ur child to point to the words on the page and then the pic. Ask them how a magazine is like a book. Diff? Cut words and pics from a magazine and put in a bag. Ask ur child to sort the words and pics into 2 piles. While reading with ur child point to the words as u read. After reading a word that is shown in the pic, tell ur child to point to the illustration and show the word. 4 year olds:  Gather 4-5 items that are similar in some ways/diff in others (ex:diff matchbox cars).Ask ur child how the items r the same(small,4 wheels) & diff(color,shape).   Before reading a new story to ur child skim the pages for new or unusual vocabulary. Talk w/ur child about these words before reading.   Read a version of Goldilocks & the 3 Bears. Discuss the concept: big, med & small. Search ur house for the biggest/smallest chair. Point out a med sized chair.   Once a mo. take ur child to a place he/she has never been.Go to an antique store,a new park or a working construction site.Talk about the things u see there!   Parents-u r doing a SUPER job! Simply subscribing to PLC shows how much u care about ur child. Take some time for urself today. We think ur awesome!

Training a "technology mindset" - how schools deal with integrating technology innovation

Written by Chris on December 6, 2011 - Leave a Comment

During Chicago Ideas week Pocket Literacy Coach and the Illinois Technology Association co-produced an event that brought together education leaders from across the city. As a result of the work we did before and after, we produced a significant document: "Integrating a 'Technology Mindset' for 21st Century Success in Chicago Schools." The paper was co-written by Dr. Chris Drew, Ryan Blitstein, Pam Cray, April Goble, Dr. Max McGee and Brenda Darden Wilkerson. The document is a roadmap for educators, policy makers and technology innovators to follow for HOW TO initiate innovation in Chicago schools. We all know that teaching tech skills is (or should be) an essential part of what our students are learning, but navigating the terrain for how to integrate innovations is supremely challenging. Navigating state and school standards, curricula needs, student abilities, teacher training and buy-in, vetting the enormous range of software/hardware options, and more are hugely time-consuming and not straightforward. For example, can a school use its eRate funds to pay for program X? Will integrating program Y require additional teacher training that conflicts with union contracts? What has been the feedback from students and teachers about programs Z and ZZ - and what's the real difference?  The Technology Mindset document provides a systematic overview for how to begin to tackle some of these issues. The highlights include: Creating a technology vision statement for your school Evaluating the stakeholders and including them in the process - especially the students, teachers and business community members Assessing your school's needs, the skill levels of your teachers and students and the real-world tech skills demanded Creating appropriate local and state technology policy - including IT course requirements Discovering funding issues And a guide for HOW TO navigate these and other issues related to integrating tech innovations at school This is the most substantive contributions yet that any Chicago group has made for leading the way on HOW TO integrate innovation in our classrooms. It deserves serious consideration. We hope that you will give it a read and share it widely with your friends. As a group of tech innovators and leaders it's important to understand the challenges that tech adopters face. This document will give you some insight into that as well.

National Parent Involvement Day - types of parent support

Written by Chris on November 17, 2011 - Leave a Comment

What does "parent involvement" mean? Since today is National Parent Inovlement Day it is fitting that we consider what it means to be involved as a parent in our children's education and lives? There are numerous ways that parents can be involved. And, depending on the age and developmental level of your child, the way you are involved in your child's learning and development can be significantly different. For example, from birth to 18-24 months parents involvement means doing just about everything for your child - feeding, holding, changing, everything. By the time your child is walking, talking with a bigger vocabulary and able to go to the bathoom on their own, parent involvement begins to change form. Once children are school age parenting means doing things like being supportive, enforcing boundaries, encouraging exploration, discipline and routine setting, modeling positive behaviors, etc. When adolescece rolls around - and the hormones start kicking in - parenting starts to become more hands-off. By high school parenting consists of working to guide your child towards test prep resources, understanding college requirements, financial literacy and otherwise helping your teenager transition into adulthood by exposing them to more adult conversations and responsibilities. I want to focus for a moment on the grade school age. On a day wherein the focus is on parent involvement it's important to understand the various forms that involvement can take. The default assumption is that parent involvement = attending parent-teacher conferences and showing up to school events and outings. The reality is that there are many more forms of parent involvement than just these. As parents we may have conflicting schedules, transportation issues, younger children to look after, or a host of other reasons why showing up at school is not always feasible. The interesting thing about this form of parent involvement (i.e. attending parent-teacher conferences and volunteering at school) is that research shows that this form of parent involvement has a bigger impact on *teachers' perceptions* of parents than it does on student performance. This does not mean that attending school functions is not important. It does mean, however, that sometimes an inappropriate amount of focus can be placed on this form of PI.  What research has demonstrated over the years is that during elementary ages, the most important forms of parent involvement on positive student performance are parenting style (e.g. discipline, routines, supporting academic activities, modeling positive behavior, promoting literacy and learning, etc.) and setting expectations. These two forms of parent support are not always visible to family outsiders.  One challenge to being an involved parent is finding appropriate and accessible resources to support YOU, the parent. The challenges to being a good and involved parent are many. And there are resources such as Pocket Literacy Coach that can supplement your parenting knowledge to help you be the best parent you can. But if you love and nurture and support your child, chances are you are already doing a pretty darn good job! :-)

Science literacy with nutrition: Four year old science activities

Written by Chris on November 7, 2011 - Leave a Comment

As you know, Pocket Literacy Coach provides parents with daily text messages with educational activities for you to use with your child. Each activity helps build specific skills to build pre-literacy skills, early literacy skills and critical thinking and learning skills. At PLC we make sure you have fun and creative activities to do with your child to help make them smarter every day! This week’s activities focus on science with food! With the activities below you will explore nutrition, senses, states of matter, hot and cold, evaporation and parts of a plant with foods you probably already have in the fridge or pantry! As always, while experimenting remember to ask your child to predict outcomes before you begin, discuss procedures and steps and talk about results.  While the activities below are designed with four year olds in mind, you can do these with your toddler and for you older kiddos. There's no age-limit on having fun and learning together :-) Enjoy the activities this week! Gather a few packages of food from the pantry or fridge. Talk with your child about healthy/unhealthy food choices. What makes a cookie unhealthy? Put 10 grapes into the fridge and 10 in the freezer. When frozen set out both and let your child sample each. Help your child compare/contrast the texture & temperature of each. Discuss what happens when water freezes - it becomes like the frozen grapes! Let your child help you wash grapes. Then draw a picture of the grapes. Put the grapes in the oven and bake them on low heat for 6-7 hourrs. What happened to the grapes? Draw an after picture and compare it to the before picture. Discuss what has happened (dehydration). Let your child see/taste the different parts of a plant we can eat. For example: A carrot=root, celery=stem, spinach=leaf and apple=fruit (which began as a flower). Look for pictures on the internet to see where these foods came from and how they grow. Make a healthy snack together! For example:Ants on a log! Take a celery stick, spread peanut butter along the inside. Lay raisins (ants) on the log. Or get a bunch of apples and make homemade applesauce!

Our students can't read at grade level. What's the answer

Written by Chris on November 2, 2011 - Leave a Comment

The National Assessment of Educational Progress released its annual report card and guess what? Our nation's students are struggling. Fewer than 40% of Illinois 4th graders are not reading at 4th grade reading proficiency levels. Crap! No Child Left Behind has worked - sort of. Our students have bumped up between 1-4 points in the past 9 years. So there's been an improvement in student performance, but not nearly enough. It's been mediocre at best.  So how do we improve our students' performance? One solution is to teach our kids sooner. When students start Kindergarten unable to identify letters, sounds and numbers, they're already behind! Learning starts at home, in the preschool years, before students enter our K-12 systems. Quality teachers are the key to classroom success and improved learning. But teachers do not work alone. Students learn (or not) before the 8:30 a.m. bell rings and after they stream back into their neighborhoods and communities at 3:00. For 0-5 year olds, parents are the first and most important teacher. And parents have to read with their children, model reading practices, talk about reading, have conversations, expose their children to new vocabulary. Parents have to do this. Many parents may not know how to do this or may not have time. Parent invovlement is essential, though.  Another integer in the equation is community members. Community cooperation from businesses and organizations also needs to support learning within the educational mega system.  Nobody disagrees with the fact that we must have quality teachers in the classroom. However, teachers cannot do it all. They have to have support, and parents have to be at the heart of that support. Parents have to help their children learn to read at home.

Reading and communicating with your child builds reading and language skills

Written by Chris on September 20, 2011 - Leave a Comment

For several years now (since the late '90s-early '00s) research has been mounting about the correlation between a child's school success and their parent's level of involvement. Especially in early childhood (birth to aprox. 4 yrs) parents should be doing time-intensive activities such as reading with their child and communicating frequently. Also important are parenting sytles and the expectations that parents set for their child. William Jeynes' research, which can be fournd in the Family Involvement Research Digest published by Harvard's Family Research project, is quite clear about the important impact of these four activities:These four involvement techniques "had a greater impact on student educational outcomes than some of the more demonstrative aspects of parental involvement, such as having household rules, and parental attendance and participation at school functions."  The time-intensive activities of reading with your child and communicating with your child help expose them to new language, new langauge patterns, fluency techniques, comprehension techniques, and more. Reading comprehension and fluency are especially important. They may not necessarily be skills that your child will acquire as a 1 or 2 year old, but by exposing them to these things at a young age certainly is part of the early literacy development process. And, of course, communicating with your child will help them acquire new vocabulary.  What about older children? Communicating and reading with your older child will start to look a bit different as they develop into independent readers. But talking to them about what they are reading and asking probing questions and asking them to apply what they're learning to the world around them will help their critical thinking and reading comprehension skills as well. Also, having mature conversations with your child about your day or allowing them to participate in adult conversations about complex topics will continue to expose them to complex thought patterns, language and more!  Building these learning skills, thinking skills, reading skills, communication skills in part happen naturally through your efforts as a parent.  To share some specific ideas for how to do this, let's talk a bit about nursery rhymes: This week you and your child will explore familiar nursery rhymes. Each day you will focus on a particular rhyme, and then extend learning with a simple activity.  Nursery rhymes are wonderful for literacy development. They are typically short and easy to memorize, enabling your child to “read” them independently and build confidence. They are filled with rhyming words! And, they expose your child to the natural rhythm and flow of spoken language. After completing the craft activities this week, print the words to the rhymes and attach them to the project. Display finished projects to encourage future practice. Show them to family members and visitors and encourage your child to recite the rhymes to an audience! Enjoy the lessons this week! Recite/read Mary Had a Little Lamb. After, let ur child glue cotton balls to a paper plate. Attach 4 black rectangle legs & a black head.   After reciting The Eensy Weensy Spider color ur child’s thumb w/a washable black marker. Ask ur child to make thumbprints on paper. Then add 8 legs to ea print.   Make a paper“Humpty Dumpty” & cut into pieces. Secretly hide pieces. Recite the rhyme then hunt for the pieces. Help ur child put him back together w/band-aids.

Activities to improve reading comprehension

Written by Chris on August 1, 2011 - Leave a Comment

This week’s Pocket Literacy Coach lessons focus on reading comprehension.  When a child has acquired the ability to comprehend what is being read or what is being read to them, they are able to understand text, recall details and events and they are able to effectively communicate ideas regarding the story.  Comprehension skills come with a great deal of practice.  Provide your child lots of opportunities to predict what a story will be about or what event might be coming next and discuss their predictions.  Allow your child to retell (in their own words) a favorite, familiar story.  Identify characters in stories, discuss where stories take place (setting), and stop to talk about difficult/new vocabulary.  Look at artwork within a book and relate it to the text.  It is most important that you read daily to your child! For those of you who do not yet subscribe to Pocket Literacy Coach, the activities below are examples of what we provide parents on a daily basis. Enjoy the lessons this week!!!   Get a picture book that is new to ur child. Before reading, “walk through” the book. Let ur child look @ pictures & predict what will happen in the story.   During story time stop periodically & draw “quick-pics” of what is happening in the text. When finished, ask ur child to use the quick-pics to retell the story.   After reading a story ask questions about the characters. Ex: Which is ur fav/least fav char? Which is most like u? Which char was in the story the most?   Read a story w/ur child. After reading discuss the story events. Ask ur child to draw a pic of something that happened in the story.    Most libraries have audio books just for kids! Each wk check out 2-3 titles. Show ur child how to use ur cd/tape player. Set up a special “listening space”.

Prediction skills to build reading comprehension

Written by Chris on July 15, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Prediction skills are an important aspect of reading comprehension. Asking children to create their own idea of what is coming next requires them to analyze the story and is a good indicator of their comprehension.  Be sure your child is engaged while you are reading and assess their understanding through their predictions.  If your child makes a reasonable prediction and is able to explain their thinking, then they are doing a great job of listening. Model for your child how you make predictions. Set an example for your child before you begin reading.  For example, before reading a book, look at the title, the cover images and characters and have your child guess what the story will be about. Your child’s response will tell you what they know about making predictions. You can also work on prediction skills even when not reading. For example, you could ask “What do you think will happen if I dropped this egg on the floor?” More complex questions while watching TV shows or movies will also help build your child's analytical skills. Pause a movie or during a commercial break ask your child about the characters, "What do you think Dora will do next?" "Do you think Woody and Buzz Lightyear will reunite?"  You can make the questions simple or complex depending on your child's age. Analysis and comprehension is something that we all use on a daily basis. Have a good time and make a game out of it at an early age!

How Education is Changing: Reforming the way we support parents

Written by Chris on June 2, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Last night, during a conversation with some moms and dads, the topic turned to education and how "parents these days just don't care." Naturally, I had to jump in to dispel some of the commonplace notions about parent involvement. Sadly, various organizations have manufactured this cliche mantra about parent involvement. And this oft-repeated, never-analyzed cliche usually suggests that low-income students are failing because their low-income families aren't involved or, more harshly, don't care. This simply is not true. Obviously there are your outliers, but a lone wolf does not a pack make. The larger picture is much more nuanced.  First, every parent cares about their child's success in school and in life. To suggest otherwise is to misunderstand the scope and depth of human love - the instinct to care for and raise a child. Yes, even low-income moms and dads love their kids! It's important to be explicit about this, because while it may seem common sense, blame games about parents' caring/not caring have an implicit claim about love and care.  Second, parent involvement is about available resources. If, as a child, you were not read to or if you didn't have reading materials circulating throughout your house or otherwise didn't see or experience the tools of the learned, then as a parent you don't have that model to imitate. You don't have that experience as a resource. Or, if you're working full time (maybe more than one job!), then you don't have the resource of time. You don't have time to read the latest book or education articles. This is a resource. Or maybe you are not a teacher (alert: just as most people aren't doctors or bankers or masons, most people aren't teachers and don't have an education background!). This, too, is a resource. If as a parent we don't know or don't have time to engage in learning activities within the home, that is a resource deficiency, not a love deficiency.  Third, 21st century educational realities are much different than what we experienced when we were in school (I can say "we" because this applies to anybody who wasn't in school just 10 short years ago). The amount of information that kids are exposed to, the breakthroughs in learning research, the explosion of available technological tools: all these and more represent breakthroughs in the science of teaching and learning that no parent can expect to have mastered. Part of what this means is that teaching and learning appear to be more complex and not as easily accessible for parents. A perception (dare I say myth?) is starting to surround educational delivery methods. Which is to say, sometimes we take for granted that sitting on the porch with the paper or laying in bed with a book with our child is a formative learning experience. These types (and more!) of "lo-tech" teaching/learning moments still matter. A LOT! There is yet more nuance to this topic (e.g. issues of human capital, education policy, etc.). But the main point, here, is that to suggest parents who are not involved in their child's cognitive development don't care is grossly uninformed. For those parents who aren't involved - and we'll do well to remember that fewer than 45% of parents read to their kids & fewer than 28% of parents tell their kids stories - it has more to do with access to resources. Parents need to be better supported. There are easy solutions to this. And if as a society we are serious about reforming education, we must reform the way we think about parent involvement. We *must* reform the way we support our parents.

The economics and special interests of education reform

Written by Chris on May 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

When we talk about reforming or reinventing our schools, we have to remember that it's not as easy as simply flipping a switch. There is a regulatory and legislative process that has to be taken into consideration. As well, most of the successfully reformed schools that you read about were not turned around over night; it often takes years of hard work. It would be nice, though, if that hard work were easier to scale and there was less red tape involved. But education isn't just about education. It's about economics, politics and legislative procedures and regulatory entities and special interests. And because education is an entangled industry one of the few ways to have a voice or gain observable, real traction is to work to reinvent the system through enterprising educational ventures. In other words, it's a long row to hoe if we want to create change from within our public (and even private) education systems. Why? The easiest first example is testing. Testing is essential for things like college admission. There are plenty of other reasons. And here, from the author of Naked Economics, Charles Wheelen, are some other examples of why the education industry is a lumbering beast impervious to large-scale change. Consider the case of teacher certification. Every state requires public school teachers to do or achieve certain things before becoming licensed. Most people consider that to be quite reasonable. In Illinois, the requirements for certification have risen steadily over time. Again, that seems reasonable given our strong emphasis on public school reform. But when one begins to scrutinize the politics  of certification, things become murkier. The teachers' unions, one of the most potent political forces in America, always support reforms that require more rigorous training and testing for teachers. Read the fine print, though. Almost without exception, these laws exempt current teachers from whatever new requirement is being imposed. In other words, individuals who would like to become teachers have to take additional classes or pass new exams; existing teachers do not. That doesn't make much sense if certification laws are written for the benefit of students. If doing certain things is neccessary in order to teach, then presumably anyone standing at the front of a classroom should have to do them. Other aspects of certification law don't make much sense either. Private school teachers, many of whom have decades of experience, cannot teach in public schools without jumping through assorted hoops (including student teaching) that are almost certainly unnecessary. Nor can university professors. When Albert Einstein retired to Princeton, New Jersey, he was not legally qualified to teach high school physics. Meanwhile, researchers have found that certification requirements have virtually no correlation with performance in the classroom. Mr Stigler would have argued that all of this is easy to explain. Just think about how the process benefits teachers, not students. Making it harder to become a teacher reduces the supply of new entrants into the profession, which is a good thing for those who are already there. Any barrier to entry looks atractive from the inside. (142-3) I am not a neigh-sayer. Reinvention CAN take place in spite of regulatory and other hurdles. And teachers are NOT a barrier to improving education. Spend just half a day in a school and you'll see their dedication and commitment to the students. Economic and policy analyses like Wheelen's cast a long shadow the teaching profession. But teacher's unions and others who represent teachers to legislatures who control teacher salaries and benefits are doing as we would want anybody to do who is representing us. The boots on the ground, the teachers, are easy scapegoats. But your average teacher does not herself have the political power to induce the type of change we want and need to see. In the next post I will offer some examples of how reform and reinvention are moving ahead. And I'll give you some resources to consider.

Study supports efficacy of PLC as a mobile learning tool

Written by Chris on May 26, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Mobile learning tools are increasingly becoming a common way to engage both kids and parents in pre-literacy and early literacy learning activities. iPhone and iTouch applications such as Pocket Phonics are continuing the 21st century learning revolution. Carly Shuler's report, "Pockets of Potential," highlights the impact that mobile learning tools can have on pre-literate and early literate children. One of the problems, notes Shuler, is that educational policy and practice are not meeting kids where they are. On average, each day kids are spending as much time "on screen" (with various media - cell, computer, gaming, etc.) as they are in the classroom. While there has been much lamentation about the distracting nature of cell phones, for example, the fact is this is what/where kids are engaging. Another significant problem is the disunified approach and underfunded nature of mobile learning technologies. More resources and more research need to be invested into mobile learning platforms. Apropos to PLC, and where we believe Pocket Literacy Coach offers the most efficacious response to the current problem of under-developed mobile educational platforms is embodied in this passage from Shuler: The trajectory for academic and life success is established in the preschool and primary years, when children are developing new habits for learning and social development. This is where the ubiquity of children’s engagement with media is so critical. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, children as young as eight years old spend as many hours engaging with various "screens" as they do in school. There are a multitude of solutions already available in the educational technology and "child centered" market. The advantage that PLC has over ALL of the products that we've seen and evaluated is that our platform, our approach, involves parents directly. Whereas a lot of products, say, the iPhone app "Pocket Phonics," fall short is that the program isolates the child from the parent. In and of itself this is not hugely problematic. But the one thing that literacy scholars have known for decades is that literacy is a social phenomenon: reading, writing and talk about the printed word happens in culturally idiosyncratic ways. And the social element is important, it's essential, for successfully enculturating the youth of our society. Shuler's report identifies five key opportunities in mobile learning: Encourage 'anywhere, anytime' learning Reach underserved children Improve 21-century social interactions Fit with learning environments Enable a personalized learning experience Guess what? Pocket Literacy Coach is a response to ALL FIVE of these opportunities!! Stay tuned to read more about HOW...

Dealing with stress and pressure of being a great mom

Written by Chris on May 22, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Tired. Stressed. Overworked. Pressured. Most moms feel this on a regular basis. And many moms carry these and other feelings inside without ever showing it, without ever letting their kids or families know. Moms have the ultimate poker face! In a conversation earlier this week I was talking with a friend who expressed some of these feelings of exasperation. She was in tears. She called because she needed a good cry session. It was so cathartic for her. That simple release of emotions, that complex moment of vulnerability, helped her so much. We've talked several times this week since then. And she's almost like a new person. Moms can't do it all. But they sure as heck try (and usually succeed)! As parents we have to remember to take care of ourselves on occasion - physically, emotionally and spiritually. We have to be healthy for ourselves because we are models for our kiddos. It's not selfish; it's being a good role model.  So go get that mani-pedi. Take an afternoon to go watch a game with the guys. Get a babysitter and have a night out on the town. Find an escape while the kids are taking a nap (Price is Right, anybody??).  As parents we work hard to ensure our kids will be happy and successful. But we place a lot of pressure on ourselves. A week or so ago I received an email from another mom. She wrote: "I really like the idea of PLC, but frankly it kind of stresses me out. While inspired by the ideas, I feel a bit overwhelmed by the frequency of them. I just don't have the time to do all of the exercises and games and having them pile up is just a reminder of all the things I don't have time to do... Thanks for the good tips I received, though!" I love getting this type of feedback because it helps me and my team develop new features and make adjustments to PLC. However, more importantly, sharing these types of thoughts and insights helps us have a conversation about the challenges of being a great parent. It's not easy being a great dad or mom! And we hit road bumps and potholes along the way. We have to remember, this is OKAY! Laura was expressing in her email something that a lot of us feel. Here's what I wrote back: "Many (if not most!) of the parents who use PLC do not do all of the exercises every single day. In fact, many moms and dads have reported how they like to let the activities pile up throughout the week and then save them in their phone to have activity day on the weekend. You're certainly not alone in picking and choosing which games to play! :-)" And you do not have to put pressure on yourself to do each and every activity. That's not the point of PLC! Our goal is for PLC to be a convenient resource for busy moms and dads. How you use our resources is up to you! Moms, dads, babysitters, family members: we would love to hear from you how you deal with some of the stresses of being a great parent. We would love to hear how you are using PLC in your lives. Pictures and videos are welcome, too! 

Parent's passion and Title I funding

Written by Chris on May 18, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Earlier this week I received a flyer and an announcement from the Chicago Public School Parent Advisory Committee (for Cluster 1 and 3 NCLB Title I) about a workshop. It sounded interesting and potentially informative. However, it was being held about an hour outside the city and it cost a few hundred dollars. The costs were reimbursable with NCLB Title I funds for parent involvement. But the problem with using funds for this type of event is that such a small percentage of parents benefit from such an inconvenient workshop. In other words, it isn't actually supporting parents. In this week's PAC meeting for Cluster 1 it was made clear why they have this workshop: the PAC's had left over money and all six of the PAC's had to spend the money before the end of the budget year. Why? Because if they don't use all of the allocated Title I funds they can't ask for a larger budget the following fiscal year.  The fact that these cluster PAC's were spending their money on another workshop is indicative of the services and products available to them. I would also argue that it is indicative of the nature of parent involvement. In the first case, parents are not presented with a range of vendors who have products that are easily scalable. Which is to say, PAC's don't have a lot of options from vendors for products or services that are made easily accessible to ALL of a district's parents. In the second case, parent involvement funds are deployed by those parents who are actually involved in the decision-making process. Parents who cannot attend the 10:00 a.m. meetings or who cannot travel an hour out of town on a Thursday are out of sight, out of mind and left out of NCLB Title I funds and programming.   When you attend PAC meetings throughout the Chicago Public School district you get to see many of the vendors who are promoting their businesses and services. There are three types of vendors: Workshop vendors, Fundraising vendors, Food vendors. A fourth type might include Miscellaneous vendor - a business or service that has an offering outside of the three primary vendors. The point here is that parents are not presented with enough options. There are not enough support services and support products being made available to parents who's children are in Title I schools.  There is no shortage of parent passion when it comes to trying to help create a great school. In fact, I regularly see and hear about parents who are trying to be involved in their child's development, but who are often rebuffed by school bureaucracy or by their own lack of access to resources or know-how. What, then, is the answer to this riddle: Funds are available, parents are interested, schools need parents to be supportive of their children, yet there is a disconnect.   Pocket Literacy Coach works hard to be a resource to help parents. What other resources are out there? How do you get involved? More importantly - and this should be the role of every PAC parent-representative - how do the involved parents bring in resources to help support the other, un-involved parents? Because, at least in the case of PAC's, this is what parent representatives should be doing: working and leading to support the whole.

Reading comprehension strategies & developmentally appropriate books

Written by Chris on May 16, 2011 - Leave a Comment

During weeks in which Pocket Literacy Coach focuses our activities on reading, there are a whole host of aspects or reading skills to focus on. And of course, these host of skills vary depending on the age and developmental level of your child. If your child is in kindergarten/1st grade then they are probably reading ”level appropriate” books independently now. It is important that your child is reading books that are suitable for his or her reading level. If a book is too hard, all of your child’s energy will be focused on decoding (figuring out the difficult words), and this will effect the comprehension of what is being read. Reading books that are too hard can also leave a child feeling frustrated. This can develop negative feelings toward reading and these feelings can hinder future literacy success.  Help ur child choose books that are not too difficult. How do you do this? Well, normally children's books have appropriate age ranges printed either on the front cover or the back cover (sometimes the print may be small, so you may have to look hard). However, sometimes age ranges do not necessarily coincide with developmental level. In cases where there are no age ranges printed, or even if they are printed and you're unsure if the book is the right fit for your child try this: If any given page has more than 5 “I’m stuck words” the book is too hard. Your child may get stuck on these words, but you won't. These difficult books are still great for you to read during story time! You are still your child’s best reading role model! Hearing you read the words fluidly will expose your child not only to new vocabulary (be sure to stop and explain these new words) but new concepts too (remember: new words = new concepts, so try to elaborate on the definitions by giving elaborated examples).  There are many things you can do to help with reading comprehension. Here are just a couple of Pocket Literacy Coach activities you can do: BEFORE reading: look at the cover & predict what the story will be about. DURING: Stop & ask questions. AFTER: Reflect on what u have read. Did u like it? Why? Ask ur child: Where did this story take place? Challenge ur child to draw a map of the book’s setting & label it. Enjoy!

Phonemes: Learning letter sounds

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Children typically do not master the majority of phonemes until the age of five. Knowing this fact, I like to make sure that my daughter is exposed to as many phonemes as possible. Remember that kids demonstrate understanding prior to demonstrating the skill. For example, my daughter calls her uncle Steve “Teve.” She can say the sounds “s” and “t.” So I thought “over teaching” the phoneme pair then she would learn to say it correctly. So we practiced our snake sound, “Sssssssssssssssssss.” Then we over emphasized the “Sssssssss,” prior to saying “Teve.” Over time we decreased the pause between the “Ssssssssssss” and the “Teve.” No luck. The closest thing we got to Steve was, “Ssssss” pause “teve.” So I just forgot about focusing on that (because there are so many other things that our little ones can learn and there is no sense in letting anyone get frustrated). Three weeks later Uncle Steve came to visit us. My little one opened the door and yelled, “Hi, Steve!”

Baby talk?

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

One of the things we have to be aware of with youngsters is that they pick up on the behaviors and actions that adults model. When you think they aren't looking or listening, they are! Such observations are how mini-humans learn how to talk, how to listen, how to take turns, how to carry themselves, socialize, etc. I always encourage folks to have sophisticated, adult conversations in front of their children. Why? Because even if the kids can't follow the concepts or the gist of the convo, they're still being exposes to "rich and varied" language, they are being exposed to complex sounds the nuances of which are being soaked up in their brains. Having adult conversations around our children, however, should not preclude us from speaking with lower levels of diction appropriate to our children's levels of understanding. For those of you with babies and young children, how do you talk to them? What are things you do with your child that you think is effective for expanding their vocabulary and helping them with their language skills? We'd love to hear!

Building a foundation for future success

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

In 2008 the National Panel on Early Literacy - in conjunction with the National Center for Family Literacy - published it's findings on early literacy skills. This extensive document - over 200 pages in length - synthesizes early literacy research and illuminates pre-literacy skills that are essential to future success in school and in life. The report states that there are six variables that represent early literacy skills that are predictive of later literacy development and success. These "conventional reading and writing skills are developed in the years from birth to age five and [have] consistently strong relationship[s] with later conventional literacy skills" (vii). The panel drew from numerous studies (over 500 such studies) to conclude that there is significant predictive power of these skills in relationship to future literacy and school success. These six early skills include: - alphabet knowledge: knowledge of the names and sounds associated with printed letters - phonological awareness: the ability to detect, manipulate, or analyze the auditory aspects of spoken language (including the ability to distinguish or segment words, syllables, or phonemes), independent of meaning - rapid automatic naming of letters or digits: the ability to rapidly name a sequence of random letters or digits - rapid automatic naming of objects or colors: the ability to rapidly name a sequence of repeating random sets of pictures of objects (e.g., "car," "tree," "house," "man") or colors - writing or writing name: the ability to write letters in isolation on request or to write one's own name - phonological memory: the ability to remember spoken information for a short period of time (vii). These essential pre-literacy skills are the foundation for future success when it comes to both conventional and critical reading and writing skills. And wouldn't you know it, Pocket Literacy Coach consists of mini-lessons that instill these emergent skills! The ease and portability of PLC lessons makes it easy for parents to help build this foundation with your kids. PLC helps you prepare your child for success! For the full report, check out this link to famlit.org.

The importance of pre-literacy skills!

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

The National Early Literacy Panel (NELP) analyzed over 7,000 peer-reviewed articles pertaining to early literacy. One of the most significant findings of the panel's research was the relationship between Alphabet Knowledge and Concepts about print to Decoding, Spelling and Reading Comprehension respectively. In other words, the NELP found that the pre-literacy skills of Alphabet Knowledge and Concepts about print strongly correlate to later success with Decoding, Spelling and Reading Comprehension. Children who learn their alphabet early and children who are exposed to print concepts early do significantly better in later grades. The NELP also found statistically significant correlations between Decoding, Spelling and Reading Comprehension in relation to the following eight skills: Phonological Awareness, Rapid Automatic Naming (RAN) of letters and digits, RAN of objects and colors, Writing or writing name, Oral language, Phonological short term memory, Visual perception and Print awareness. Here's what the NELP panel had to say: These findings highlight the fact that the origins of well-developed conventional literacy skills are found very early in children’s educational experience, and these findings are consistent with studies (Francis et al., 1996; Juel, 1988; Torgesen & Burgess, 1998) showing that the consequences of falling seriously behind in the development of conventional literacy skills are likely to be long-lasting in the absence of substantial remedial efforts. ("Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel" p. 86) What does this all mean? It means that laying the foundation for success at reading and writing starts BEFORE our children can read and write. Becoming a successful reader and writer and critical thinker begins when our kids are pre-literate. Furthermore, the effects of not giving them these early literacy skills are long-lasting. As a college educator I've seen the struggles and heard the songs of sorrow from students who didn't get that early start with their education. These students come from the most affluent neighborhoods to the poorest. These are the students who need remediation all the way up until their college years. Whether it's as a nation or as an individual family, we want the best for our future generations. And when we seek answers we often over look the basics. It doesn't get any more basic than establishing a firm foundation for success by providing your child with essential pre-literacy skills.

Read and sing to your child - it makes her brain grow.

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

This may seem hard to believe, but did you know that your infant begins developing her language skills - along with reading and writing skills! - as early as one-three months of age!? That's crazy to think about, but both brain research and early education research has been suggesting for years now that early exposure to language from parents and caregivers is crucial to a child's cognitive and social development. There are other sources for me to point you to (such as neuroscientist Lise Eliot), but I recently was reviewing an IRA/NAEYC document: "Learning to Read and Write: Developmentally Appropriate Practices for Young Children." This paper is a joint position statement of the International Reading Association and the National Association for the Education of Young Children. The position paper is endorsed by just about every major early childhood education group, teachers groups, physicians, literacy scholars, and so on. Starting from birth, infants' brains are like sponges. Early exposure to language does matter: Even in the first few months of life, children begin to experiment with language. Young babies make sounds that imitate the tones and rhythms of adult talk; they “read” gestures and facial expressions, and they begin to associate sound sequences frequently heard—words—with their referents (Berk 1996). They delight in listening to familiar jingles and rhymes, play along in games such as peek-a-boo and pat-a-cake, and manipulate objects such as board books and alphabet blocks in their play. From these remarkable beginnings children learn to use a variety of symbols (p. 3) These social interactions lay an important foundation for cognitive, emotional, and social development. Activities as simple as singing or reading to your child help make them smarter! Teaching isn't something that only teachers do. It starts with the parents. Parent-involvement is as important - some would argue MORE important - for developmental and behavioral maturation as formal schooling in the early years of your baby's life. Many parents are not aware of seemingly simple and obvious facts such as the ones above. Help spread the word! Sing to your baby. Read to your infant. Talk with your toddler. Point out colors. Discuss the function of different tools. Immerse your little one in language of exploration. A final point about reading aloud: The single most important activity for building these understandings and skills essential for reading success appears to be reading aloud to children (Wells 1985; Bus, Van Ijzendoorn, & Pellegrini 1995). High-quality book reading occurs when children feel emotionally secure (Bus & Van Ijzendoorn 1995; Bus et al. 1997) and are active participants in reading (Whitehurst et al. 1994). Asking predictive and analytic questions in smallgroup settings appears to affect children’s vocabulary and comprehension of stories (Karweit & Wasik 1996). Children may talk about the pictures, retell the story, discuss their favorite actions, and request multiple rereadings. It is the talk that surrounds the storybook reading that gives it power, helping children to bridge what is in the story and their own lives (Dickinson & Smith 1994; Snow et al. 1995). Snow (1991) has described these types of conversations as “decontextualized language” in which teachers may induce higher-level thinking by moving experiences in stories from what the children may see in front of them to what they can imagine. (p. 3) Reading to your child - even to infants! - exposes them to the rhythms of language, models the simple physical act of holding a book, reading from left to right/top to bottom, helps with decoding and phonics skills, inspires inquisitiveness and creative thinking. What's your child's favorite book? Take a break from what you're doing and read with him. If you're busy cleaning the house or working on the computer, look over at your child and sing a lil melody. For more daily suggestions, subscribe to Pocket Literacy Coach

The PLC Team

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Starting this week additional members of the PLC team will be publishing their insights and sharing their wisdom. We are happy to announce Kelley and Kassie! Kelley Henry earned her M.S. in Communication Disorders and Sciences. Her expertise is in typical language development and disordered language development and literacy skills in children.  Her interests and experience range from language development through out the lifespan. Kelley works and lives in Springfield with her hubby, her two lil bundles. Kassie Redmond received her B.A. in Special Education, Cross-Categorical K-12.  The emphasis of her study was in learning disabilities, emotional/behavioral disorders and mental retardation.  Kassie also has an M.A. is in Curriculum Instruction. She has experience with early literacy curriculum development as a special educator in the regular school setting as well as in a life/community skills classroom.  Kassie lives in Columbia with her hubby and is happily preparing for her first lil one! If one of our posts moves you, feel free to join the conversation!

My toddler knows about gravity?!

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

One of the lessons from PLC talks about the lag time between learning new words and the use of the new words.  Well my brother came to town about a month ago and played with my toddler.  While playing he would say the word “gravity” and demonstrate the word gravity.  My brother would gently toss my daughter into the air and as she fell back to his arms he would say, “Gravity.”  While chasing her around the room he explained what the definition of gravity is in language she would understand.  “Gravity pulls you back to earth.”  To say the least my daughter enjoyed this learning activity. Two weeks after my toddler’s mini-lesson she was playing with her infant sister.  While my infant was sitting in her bouncer, my toddler gently lifted the back of the bouncer as she released the bouncer she yelled, “Gravity.”  After being startled, and checking to see that the infant was fine, I thought, “She just demonstrated an understanding of the lesson my brother taught her from two weeks ago!”  So in her mini-lesson I too learned a couple of things.  First, play is an excellent medium for language learning.  Second, there is a delay in a lesson taught and lesson demonstrated.  And finally, be careful what you teach, it will come out sooner or later!

Let your child lead, and have fun! :-)

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

The other day I took my toddler to the library.  My toddler was going between the book shelves and the coloring station.  While there I began to observe another young mother and her interactions with her toddler.  The mother was attempting to address one of the pre-literacy skills that PLC talks about, how to handle a book.  The child was flipping through the pages with no rhyme or reason to his actions.  The mother was quite insistent that the little one peruse the book in the correct manner.  After several exchanges the toddler became frustrated and stopped looking at the book and became upset.  Soon after this observation the mom had to remove the toddler from the library. One thing that I thought about after leaving the library that day was that that child had missed out on a potential teachable moment.  No, the little one was not holding the book correctly (which is an important pre-literacy skill that PLC talks about), but the mother was so tuned into that portion of the lesson that maybe some other teachable skill was missed.  So that night I made a point to follow my toddler’s lead on how she interacted with the books we borrowed from the library.  She did not turn the pages appropriately every time, nor did she always hold the book in the appropriate manner; however, while we did interact with the books she did demonstrate other skills.  She told a simple story, she was able to label some of the pictures in the book and she had fun.   My toddler may not remember each thing that I “teach” but she will keep coming back because she knows that she had fun with me :-)

Refresh Everything - VOTE EVERYDAY!

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

On Wednesday we received news that Pocket Literacy Coach made it through the vetting process and is one of the 1100 Refreshing Ideas for the Pepsi Refresh Everything community grant project! So far we're doing well in the voting, but we need ALL the support we can get. Share this with a friend. Go and vote now and vote often! Voting lasts all month. So vote as much as you can. Click on the link below. AND vote by texting 102168 to 73774.

Learning to Read and Write at 3 months!

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

The process of learning to read and write doesn’t happen when your child starts Kindergarten. It doesn’t start in Pre-K either. Learning to read and write starts much earlier – as soon as 1-3 months of age when your child begins being exposed to a world of sounds, songs, and stories (according to some brain researchers it actually starts even earlier! - in the womb).  In other words, learning to read and write happens along a developmental continuum that starts almost immediately in life with parent- and caregiver-involvement. According to the International Reading Association (IRA) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC): Children take their first critical steps toward learning to read and write very early in life. Long before they can exhibit reading and writing production skills, they begin to acquire some basic understandings of the concepts about literacy and its functions. Children learn to use symbols, combining their oral language, pictures, print, and play into a coherent mixed medium and creating and communicating meanings in a variety of ways. From their initial experiences and interactions with adults, children begin to read words, processing letter-sound relations and acquiring substantial knowledge of the alphabetic system. As they continue to learn, children increasingly consolidate this information into patterns that allow for automaticity and fluency in reading and writing. Consequently reading and writing acquisition is conceptualized better as a developmental continuum than as an all-or-nothing phenomenon (p. 3). Because children learn to read so early in life, parents need information, activities, and guidelines for “best practices” to use with their child. This is what makes Pocket Literacy Coach so important!! Your 1 year old probably cannot use symbols or pretend to read - nor should she be able to. However, your 1 and 2 year old does need to be exposed to the specific sounds of the alphabet; they need to have interactions with adults who are using complex sounds and words and singing them songs and telling them stories. PLC is designed specifically and exclusively for parents and caregivers to give them activities and lessons that build essential early literacy skills.  The IRA – NAEYC report declares that “Failing to give children literacy experiences until they are school age can severely limit the reading and writing levels they ultimately attain (p. 2). Parents are the most powerful educators in the lives of their developing child! And PLC empowers you with the tools you need to give your child an early edge! A question that many parents have is “How do I know when my child should be grasping concepts about print?” “When should they know their alphabet?” These are important questions, because you want to be working with your child on developmentally appropriate skills. In our next blog post we’ll provide you with a guide to the important milestones you and your child can expect to be reaching from birth to age six.

School days shrinking?

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

A recent Chicago Tribune report, "School Days Shrinking in Illinois," reveals that Illinois' youngters aren't spending as many days in their desks as their counterparts across the country. Traditionally American school districts require 180 days of school attendance. In Illinois the state requirement is only 176 days. By combing through the records of each of Illinois' school districts, what the Tribune report found, however, is that Illinois' children are spending much less time that 176 days. Here are some of the numbers: Across the state, nearly 3,000 half-day school improvement days are scheduled this year in 622 districts. That's up about 30 percent compared with 2005, according to a Tribune review of school calendar data from 860 districts. Not including partial days, the Tribune found that Illinois students, on average, will attend school about 171 full days this year. Because of exceptions granted by state lawmakers, over 400,000 Chicago Public School students will spend 170 days or less in school. And this does not account for time missed because of early dismissals and late arrival days. Take for example Zion Elementary School District 6: because of early dismissals, students at this school will only attend 134 full days of school. State and local budget shortfalls, teacher training requirements and availability of resources are at the crux of the issue. And the issue - kids not being in school - becomes problematic on a number of fronts. Obviously they're missing out on educational opportunities, but the lack of regularized schedules can wreak havoc on parents, too. As families, communities, states and even as a nation, when we run into financially dire straights, we have to get creative. We KNOW how important it is to challenge our children intellectually. We know that schooling plays an important part in their development. Even so, families and caregivers have a vital role to play. And now more than ever is a time when parents, older siblings, uncles, grandmas and caregivers have to help fill in and create challenges for our children. One invaluable resource that can arm parents with a cornucopia of creative, challenging activities is of course Pocket Literacy Coach. For our children to grow, parents and caregivers *have* to be involved!

Dear PLC fans and subscribers: Thank you!

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Thank you for your support! Keep spreading the word and signing up!

Teaching inflection to 3 year olds

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

                The other day we were having dinner with some friends that had a daughter the same age as my oldest daughter.  When her two-year-old daughter requested an item she used a whiney voice.  I noticed that the mother told her to watch her voice and observed how this two-year-old self corrected her whiney voice.                  After this observation I asked my friend when she started correcting her daughter.  This friend of mine is also a kindergarten teacher.  She said that many of her students whine all day long and they do not recognize it because no one has ever pointed it out to them.                  I thought about her observation later that night.  What she says is so true!  Our little tykes are so good at imitating the behavior, including vocal patterns, that they don’t always realize what they are doing.  So, the next day I started with my little one.  Every time she used a voice that was less than pleasant (she like to shriek) I would tell her that she is shrieking.  I would also model the appropriate voice and ask her to use her big girl voice.  Within a few minutes she would self-correct when she was told that she was using a non-preferred voice.                 So how does this relate to literacy?  I believe that this reiterates how important it is to use inflection with a child when reading.  There should be a rise in your voice when there is a question mark, an increase in excitement when there is an exclamation point.  Over time this will assist your little reader learn that the markers at the end of the sentence mean something.                  While reading now I try to focus on using the appropriate inflection at the right time and then I pause.  This gives her a little bit of time to demonstrate what vocal pattern was just modeled!

Introducing prepositions - the sink method

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

As everybody knows, it is an uncle's duty to both tease/harass their young nieces as well as to spoil/teach them cool stuff (like how to yank a table cloth off a table without the dishes flying everywhere). Last week, while Paityn was helping her Deedee wash some grapes at the kitchen sink, I found the perfect opportunity to both tease and teach lil Paityn. As Deedee stepped away I stepped in to help. Paityn had decided to chuck a couple grapes into the sink. I thought it might be fun to pretend to chuck Paityn in the sink. As I lifted her she quickly realized the end-game, and so she started to kick and scream. (Of course I had no intention of actually putting her in the sink.) At the point where she was hovering above the sink, and as she hollered that she didn't want to go into the sink, I explained to her: "But Paityn, you're not IN the sink." "NO SINK! NO SINK! I DON'T WANT TO GO IN THE SINK." "Paityn, you are OVER the sink. You're not IN the sink. So why are you screaming?" Both Deedee and Paityn's mom, being none too amused, ambled over to the sink and took Paityn from me. After she settled back into peacefully washing her precious grapes. Deedee picked up on the lesson where I left off. First she demonstrated with a cup: "Look Paityn. The cup is OVER the sink. It's not IN the sink." Paityn imitated the action and words. Taking the lesson a step further, Deedee picked Paityn up and said, "Look Paityn! Now you are OVER the sink. With a big grin and some chuckles she blurted out: "Everybody look! I'm OVER the sink!" Paityn didn't appreciate my introduction to prepositions as much as she appreciated Deedee's version.  But that's the nature of avuncular teaching methods versus a grandma's touch.

Dr. Drew & Werd Doctor

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Here's a behind-the-scenes, sneak peak at our mascot prototype. (Shhh! Don't tell anybody!) We're having some naming issues. Of course I think Werd Doctor is pretty clever (can you guess why?). Several people have suggested Max. We have one vote for Polly. We're wondering what you think? We're also wondering when you would like to meet Max (is that her name? Is it even a her? Help us out!!). Would you like for Max to visit your school? Or reading time? Let us know!

Build for the future!

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

If you saw last night's State of the Union address you heard the President talk about building for the future. This was the major theme of his speech. And for the first time since 2001 - for the first time for as long as I can remember - education was emphasized as the most important investment for America's future. Some of the plans laid out by the President are far from perfect, but one aspect of his talk about education that was especially dear to us was his emphasis on parent involvement. Here is a bit from the President's speech: And so the question is whether all of us – as citizens, and as parents – are willing to do what’s necessary to give every child a chance to succeed. That responsibility begins not in our classrooms, but in our homes and communities. It’s family that first instills the love of learning in a child. Only parents can make sure the TV is turned off and homework gets done. We need to teach our kids that it’s not just the winner of the Super Bowl who deserves to be celebrated, but the winner of the science fair; that success is not a function of fame or PR, but of hard work and discipline. Not only is it this notion that it's "family that first instils the love of learning in a child," it's also researched fact (as just one example, see the 40+ years of research from the Chicago Longitudinal Study). Sometimes it's pleasant to hear somebody support a point you agree with, and in your euphoria you forget to think about the follow up: Okay, so how do we execute this goal??? Most parents WANT to be involved. But many parents don't have time, don't have the resources or simply don't know how to instill a love of learning in their child. When we make demands - whether it's on our parents, teachers, soldiers or whoever, we should be prepared to support them and help them get started. Pocket Literacy Coach is just one example of how to support parents in this national effort to build for the future. What other ideas do you have for supporting parents?

Animated education reform

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

I don't know about you, but all this political talk about education reform is becoming a bit tedious. The focus of all the talk about education reform centers around the bureaucracy. The "system" needs to be reformed, they tell us. Well, nobody disagrees with that. Everybody recognizes that our system of educating - which was born out of the Enlightenment period (18th century) and came to by fully systematized in the US during the Industrial Revolution (19th century) - needs to be updated for a 21st century economy. The industrial model no longer suffices. Education needs to become more agile, less rote, more creative, more in touch and, especially, it needs to escape the trap of standardization! As well, reformed education - whatever that might look like as it evolves from what it is today - needs to involve DIFFERENT players. That is, a reformed approach to education needs to involve parents, caregivers, community members, local businesses and other role models and leaders. Our teachers and principals alone cannot transform our system of education. Neither can our politicians. WE have to empower ourselves and force the changes that our children need to be successful in a 21st century global economy. Here's a great NON-political video (how refreshing!) to help wrap our heads around the conversation. It's animated. And it hits on a lot of key points about connecting our children's creativity to their futures... http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_changing_education_paradigms.html

3 year olds, focus on patterns!

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

We want to begin to introduce everybody to some of our new team members. You'll be able to learn more when we launch our new website in a few short weeks! But in the meantime, Rachel, one of our cool new mom/teacher experts, has these words of wisdom for those of you who are receiving the text messages. She wants to give you some additional context to help make this week's planned activities even more fun! Of course, these pearls of wisdom aren't JUST for 3 year olds; they're applicable for our 2, 4, 5 and 6 year olds, too. Heck, even we adults can be more perceptive when we take time to search for patterns in places. Enjoy! This week’s lessons will focus on patterns. Patterns can be found everywhere! Looking for patterns in words and numbers helps your child to become a problem solver and a critical thinker. Encouraging your child to look for patterns in their everyday life will help them to become more aware of their surroundings along with helping them to make comparisons and find relationships. To encourage your child to do this critical thinking, be sure to make the activities fun and exciting rather than strict and demanding. When you are showing your child patterns, rather than your child discovering the pattern on their own, they are still learning!

Cramming for kindergarten, the best approach?

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

How do you prepare for success? What's the best way to train - whether it's for a marathon or an important test? If you've ever run a long race chances are you planned ahead of time and prepared in intervals, working gradually and regularly towards your goal. Unless you're my brother, who once "trained" for a triathlon by forgoing a training regimen and instead "saved up my energy" for the big day, you usually take bite-sized steps towards your objective. We all believe our children are child prodigies. Some of them are born with a gift. Others are not. And "genius" is measured in myriad ways. IQ is only one such tool. You probably already know this: we can, if fact, train to become geniuses. It's hard work, but if we take regular steps in a measured approach we can achieve anything. We all want our kids to be lil geniuses, but cramming sessions and test preparation isn't the best approach for our 3 or 6 or 9 year olds. We need to facilitate a love for learning and encourage wonderment for exploration. We need to create positive attitudes and positive habits. Dedicating a small amount of time EVERYDAY to exploring something new or working on a specific skill is the best way to do this. Think about the most successful athlete, musician, writer, scientist you know of. Do you think they "cram" to learn, studying or training or writing only on occasion? Or do you think they work regularly in consistent chunks? We don't want our youngsters training rigorously at their tender ages. But we do want to set examples for them of the value of positive habits and attitudes. This philosophy of positive habit building and positive attitudes and positive parent modeling is at the heart of what Pocket Literacy Coach provides parents. In today's Chicago Tribune there is an article, "Cramming for kindergarten tests," on selective enrollment programs to get into kindergartens for "gifted" students. Notice the focus on the panicky, cramming approach to preparing for kindergarten. Think about the message this sends to our children. I'm not saying that test preparation doesn't work. My argument is against the cramming mentality. My argument is against the creativity-stifling test-prep movement. Let's bring play, exploration, fun and more positive approaches back to our education methods. Oh, and in case you're wondering how my brother performed for his triathlon...he didn't finish the race!

Unions and education: Where are parents and the community?

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Below is an excerpt from a Facebook conversation I was having with a few friends about the standoff between WI Governor Walker and the unions. Our FB group was focusing on eduction and teacher unions in particular. The gist of my argument is twofold: 1.) Funding for education in America is not at the root of the problem. I don't elaborate on it here, but the problem with education reform in the US actually has very little to do with funding and more to do with (a) parent & community involvement and (b) bulky, antiquated, impenetrable education bureaucracies. 2.) Education is suffering from economic realities: the value of a teacher is suppressed because the supply::demand ratio is such that taxpayers and school systems don't *have* to compensate teachers above the market value (which some economists would argue is artificially inflated BECAUSE of unions). A third part of my argument, which is an addendum to the FB conversation, is that the nature of the debate about education, education reform and education spending will not change in any essential way until PARENTS and COMMUNITY force themselves into the conversation. The education mega-system is a triumvirate made up of schools-parents-community. Teachers are not and should not be the sole bearers of "education." My proposal is that the field of education, along with education/teacher unions, need to become smaller and more elite. Fewer numbers means decreasing the supply, increasing the demand and growing the value of a teacher within the education market. Here is the convo excerpt - I'd love to hear your thoughts! For starters, a Chicago Public Schools spend over $11.5k/pupil per year. The avg salary of a CPS teacher is... $70k. The issue in Chicago is not a funding issue. In the City Colleges of Chicago the local 1600 successfully negotiated a contract for all TT instructors to get a guaranteed %5 raise each year, regardless of inflation rates, merit, the economy, etc. The economic reality - especially in higher education humanities - is one of supply and demand. When there's 150 people applying for 1 or 2 spots within a department, simple supply/demand economics determines the salary rate (i.e. not high). Furthermore, with such a bloated supply of available Ph.D.s the need for TT begins to dissipate as well. I'm a bit less familiar with the supply/demand issues at the k-12 level, but there seems to be similar over-supply of teachers there, too. Workers, in cases where there are more of them than there are jobs, are the victims not of stingy legislatures or union-bashers but of economic principles. Comparing teachers to basketball stars is like comparing apples to tomatoes and isn't a fruitful direction to go anyway. (How many of us have had 20,000 people show up for a lecture?) The problem has much less to do with anti-union sentiments than it does with 21st century economic realities and values. If a teacher was valued as much as a Blake Griffin dunk, then we'd be able to command an 8 figure salary. One solution: use the power of organizing to make the field of education more exclusive. Unions should move for higher requirements and more strenuous entrance criteria for coming into the field. In other words, do a better job of controlling supply as a way of increasing demand for and value of a teacher. Parents and taxpayers want their KIDS TO BE FIRST. But the perception - despite all the bleeding-heart rhetoric from teachers and their union reps - is that TEACHERS are first. This is an enormous PR problem for teachers and for education. Smaller, more nimble and flexible schools is an important first step. Smaller, more nimble school districts is a key part of this. Locally elected school boards that oversee smaller school bureaucracies with fewer layers of administration is an important step. Before ANY of this is possible, though, PARENTS must stand up, be more active, be more vocal, take more responsibility. The COMMUNITY must have a more active voice. Attention is focused on the symptoms not on the causes of our larger education hurdles. Teachers and schools are only one part of the education mega-system. Until PARENTS and COMMUNITY start actively forcing their way into these conversations, we will continue to hear and see more of the same in the education debate.

Welcome!

Written by Chris on April 28, 2011 - Leave a Comment

Soon we will begin marketing PLC to more parents and schools across the Midwest. If you know of folks who might be interested let us know! In the meantime, surf our site and let us know what you think! -PLC